News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by baggy_trough on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @01:07PM (#44249617)
What is this massive environmental harm? That sounds like hyperbole.
Re: by gknoy on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @01:24PM (#44249791)
Training AI models uses a large amount of energy (according to what I've read / headlines I've seen /etc), and increases water usage. [0] I don't have a lot to offer as proof, merely that this is an idea that I have encountered enough that I was suprised you hadn't heard of it. I did a very cursory bit of googling, so the quality + dodginess distribution is a bit wild, but there appear to be indiustry reports [2, page 20] that support this:

""" [G]lobal data centre electricity use reached 415 TWh in 2024, or 1.5 per cent of global electricity consumption.... While these figures include all types of data centres, the growing subset of data centres focused on AI are particularly energy intensive. AI-focused data centres can consume as much electricity as aluminium smelters but are more geographically concentrated. The rapid expansion of AI is driving a significant surge in global electricity demand, posing new challenges for sustainability. Data centre electricity consumption has been growing at 12 per cent per year since 2017, outpacing total electricity consumption by a factor of four. """

The numbers are about data center power use in total, but AI seems to be one of the bigger driving forces behind that growth, so it seems plausible that there is some harm.

0: https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmen... 1: https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/PR-2025-06-05-green... 2: (cf. page 20) https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Environment/Pages/Publications/...

Re: by astrange on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:45PM (#44251058)
There's an "AI is using all the water" meme online currently (especially on Bluesky, home of anti-AI scolds), which turns out to come from a study that counted hydroelectric power as using water.
Re: by coryrc on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @02:56PM (#44250637)
USA uses 21.3 TWh of petroleum per day for transportation. Even if AI was fully responsible for all data center usage (it is not even close) we're quibbling over 20 days of US transportation oil usage, which actually has devastating effects on the environment.

Data centers are already significant users of renewable electricity. They do not contaminate water in any appreciable amount.

Re: by baggy_trough on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @02:18PM (#44250314)
I agree that there is some incremental electricity usage. I do not think it can be characterized fairly as "massive environmental harm".
Re: by autoexec on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @02:56PM (#44250641)
As an example, Ren and his colleagues calculated the emissions from training a large language model, or LLM, at the scale of Meta’s Llama-3.1, an advanced open-weight LLM released by the owner of Facebook in July to compete with leading proprietary models like OpenAI's GPT-4. The study found that producing the electricity to train this model produced an air pollution equivalent of more than 10,000 round trips by car between Los Angeles and New York City. (https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2024/12/09/ais-deadly-air-poll...)

see also:

https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-ai-data-centers-dr...

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-computer-scient...

Re: by ahepp on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:43PM (#44251038)
> The study found that producing the electricity to train this model produced an air pollution equivalent of more than 10,000 round trips by car between Los Angeles and New York City.

I am totally on board with making sure data center energy usage is rational and aligned with climate policy, but "10k trips between LA and NY" doesn't seem like something that is just on its face outrageous to me.

Isn't the goal that these LLMs provide so much utility they're worth the cost? I think it's pretty plausible that efficiency gains from LLMs could add up to 10k cross USA trips worth of air pollution.

Of course this excludes the cost of actually running the model, which I suspect could be far higher

Re: by root_axis on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:42PM (#44251032)
> 10,000 round trips by car between Los Angeles and New York City.

That seems like very low impact, especially considering training only happens once. I have to imagine that the ongoing cost of inference is the real energy sink.

Re: by autoexec on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:57PM (#44251156)
It doesn't happen only once. It happened once, for one version of one model, but every model (and there are others much larger) has its own cost and that cost is repeated with each version as models are continuously being retrained
Re: by ksenzee on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @01:15PM (#44249689)
They’re restarting coal-fired power plants to run AI datacenters. I don’t know what your personal threshold is for “massive” environmental harm, but that meets mine.
Re: by baggy_trough on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @01:23PM (#44249787)
What's a specific example of that?
Re: by svnt on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @01:48PM (#44250033)
It has been widely reported. Here is an example not of a coal-fired but diesel and gas mobile power sources. If you spend time looking you will have no trouble finding sources.

> Last week, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a rule clarification allowing the use of some mobile gas and diesel power sources for data centers. In a statement accompanying the rule, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin claimed that the Biden administration's focus on addressing climate change had hampered AI development.

> "The Trump administration is taking action to rectify the previous administration's actions to weaken the reliability of the electricity grid and our ability to maintain our leadership on artificial intelligence," Zeldin said. "This is the first, and certainly not the last step, and I look forward to continue working with artificial intelligence and data center companies and utilities to resolve any outstanding challenges and make the U.S. the AI capital of the world."

https://www.newsweek.com/ai-race-fossil-powered-generators-a...

Re: by baggy_trough on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @01:50PM (#44250056)
I spent some time and could not find a specific example. You haven't shown one here, either.
Re: by coryrc on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @02:59PM (#44250673)
trump stooge activities cannot be blamed on data centers. The relevant technical authorities did not want this.
Re: by svnt on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:09PM (#44250765)
What are you talking about? This is literally the only mechanism to allow coal-fired plants to avoid sunsetting on schedule.

Who are the “relevant technical authorities”?

Re: by coryrc on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @04:34PM (#44251511)
"DOE issued the emergency order without a request from the plant owner, transmission provider or grid operator"
Re: by svnt on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @07:07PM (#44252765)
Without getting in to the fact that none of those people operate datacenters, what does that mean to you? You think Trump and Co are doing this as a purely political move to irritate environmentalists?
Re: by yencabulator on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @06:14PM (#44252413)
Oh yes environmentalism is clearly why the data center owners themselves are running generators 24/7.
Re: by coryrc on Thursday June 12, 2025 @01:36PM (#44260418)
"All of the electricity consumed by Amazon’s operations, including its data centers, was matched with 100% renewable energy in 2023."

https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/sustainability/amazon-renew...

Re: by yencabulator on Thursday June 12, 2025 @01:47PM (#44260557)
AWS is perhaps the most established vendor in this space. They if any should have their architecture sorted out and have great execution on their growth.

Meanwhile,

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/06/elon-musk-xai-memph...

https://www.newsweek.com/ai-race-fossil-powered-generators-a...

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intell...

Re: by baggy_trough on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @02:12PM (#44250251)
Sorry, but they simply are not.
Re: by jimstr on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:09PM (#44250764)
Re: by svnt on Wednesday June 11, 2025 @03:10PM (#44250768)
FTA:

> In another move, DOE on Tuesday said it was offering loan guarantees for coal-fired power plant projects, such as upgrading energy infrastructure to restart operations or operate more efficiently or at a higher output.

Please elaborate.