Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by hathawsh on Thursday May 29, 2025 @02:00PM
(#44128526)
The difference is that when AI exhibits behavior like that, you can refine the AI or add more AI layers to correct it. For example, you might create a supervisor AI that evaluates when more requirements are needed before continuing to build, and a code review AI that triggers refinements automatically.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by nevertoolate on Thursday May 29, 2025 @02:23PM
(#44128753)
Question is, how autonomous decision making works, nobody argues that llm can finish any sentence, but can it push a red button?
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by johnecheck on Thursday May 29, 2025 @05:17PM
(#44130477)
Of course it can push a red button. Trivially, with MCP.
Setting up a system to make decisions autonomous is technically easy. Ensuring that it makes the right decisions, though, is a far harder task.
So it can push _a_ red button, but not necessarily the _right_ red button
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by pandastronaut on Thursday May 29, 2025 @02:37PM
(#44128887)
I tend to see today's AI Vibrators as the managers of the 00s and their army of offshore devs.
Did you actually mean to say AI Vibrators?
I'm guessing it is a derogatory pun, alluding to vibe coders.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by platevoltage on Thursday May 29, 2025 @05:45PM
(#44130694)
Give it 3 months. There will be an AI Vibrator on the market, if there isn't one already.
Re:Human coders are still better than LLMs
by falcor84 on Thursday May 29, 2025 @07:06PM
(#44131255)
I just found this MCP integration, but unfortunately I don't have a device I can test it on - https://github.com/ConAcademy/buttplug-mcp
Probably going to have the same outcome.