News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat app. Parent comment

Re:XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat... by harg on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @11:50AM (#44117331)
It's not clear text by default, it's just not end-to-end encrypted. Messages are still encrypted between client and server.

I agree about considering alternatives though.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat... by crop_rotation on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @11:59AM (#44117449)
> Messages are still encrypted between client and server.

This is just a clever way of saying they use TLS, which I would be shocked if any mainstream app is not using.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat... by malfist on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @12:06PM (#44117525)
Don't look under the hood at sms then
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat... by crop_rotation on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @12:10PM (#44117567)
SMS is never claiming to be E2E nor is any army of SMS defenders online talking about how some virtue of SMS is almost same as E2E. While I don't like Telegram I will happily admit it is better than SMS, but how is that an argument for anything.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat... by Sohcahtoa82 on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @01:17PM (#44118295)
SMS isn't an app, it's a protocol that was created in 1992.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat... by jazzyjackson on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @11:55AM (#44117407)
Ok so theyre plaintext on the server, encrypted in transit just means https
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:XAI to pay Telegram $300M to integrate Grok into the chat... by Spooky23 on Wednesday May 28, 2025 @12:40PM (#44117854)
Is the server -> FSB connection encrypted?
[ Parent | on HN ]