News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:"We would be less confidential than Google" Proton threat... by j45 on Saturday May 17, 2025 @05:24PM (#44017071)
Or if there was a law clarifying not to tread on privacy if that’s what the population has latest indicated, this kind of effort wouldn’t always need yo be wasted.

Asking the unpaid population to put in free labour all the time seems like a deterrent.

Re:"We would be less confidential than Google" Proton threat... by hluska on Saturday May 17, 2025 @08:48PM (#44018131)
Democracy is fundamentally about putting in free labour. That’s just how it works, from the lowliest municipal elections up to federal. It’s a lot of unpaid labour.

That system works and has worked for a long time.

Re:"We would be less confidential than Google" Proton threat... by refactor_master on Saturday May 17, 2025 @10:18PM (#44018477)
I think that’s an oversimplification. You can’t take the “free labor of performing democracy” and put it to equally good use doing anything else I can think of.

I guess you could work in soup kitchens, but that’s horribly inefficient welfare compared to just electing competent leadership, if the ultimate aim is to benefit The People.

Re:"We would be less confidential than Google" Proton threat... by j45 on Saturday May 17, 2025 @11:23PM (#44018787)
Agreed on oversimplification

It’s more putting the burden on the people

By free labor I meant the bureaucrats who are paid in the otherwise to make the laws