Re:Espressif's ESP32-C5 Is Now in Mass Production
by a1371 on Thursday May 01, 2025 @02:27AM
(#43854289)
E-waste prevention is hella important. It's a tough situation though. I think for a board that goes out in the public, even at a prototyping level, it's important to know the chip you have is not tampered with. I once wanted to make a little people counter at a university campus with an ESP8266. I simply couldn't make sure it's resilient against some CS students poking at it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Espressif's ESP32-C5 Is Now in Mass Production
by yonatan8070 on Thursday May 01, 2025 @03:16AM
(#43854589)
Let's say the chip was lockable, what would prevent someone from using a bit of hot air and flux from just swapping out your chip with whatever?
Re:Espressif's ESP32-C5 Is Now in Mass Production
by saidinesh5 on Thursday May 01, 2025 @03:50AM
(#43854767)
The firmware that's missing on that new chip
Re:Espressif's ESP32-C5 Is Now in Mass Production
by bpye on Thursday May 01, 2025 @04:11AM
(#43854897)
That's why you force a full erase to clear the non programmable bit?
Re:Espressif's ESP32-C5 Is Now in Mass Production
by user32489318 on Thursday May 01, 2025 @01:39PM
(#43860880)
It takes little skill, 15USD soldering iron to solder 4-5 through holes wires, connect 10 usd programmer and flash a new firmware.
Investing in a (de)soldering station, with the risk of pulling all the neighboring components, breadboard/something to plugin your new controller or memory into for programming and what not? I’m not sure if I’d go through that trouble
Re:Espressif's ESP32-C5 Is Now in Mass Production
by alex7o on Thursday May 01, 2025 @04:22AM
(#43854965)
Yes, but this I think is a bit sad. Once you have proper hard to crack security a smart kid from CS won't find it hidden decide to hack it and write blog post about it how he has done it. As long as it is not something dangerous sometimes having less security is better
Re:Espressif's ESP32-C5 Is Now in Mass Production
by moffkalast on Thursday May 01, 2025 @04:28AM
(#43855007)
Sounds like you're trying to deprive CS students of their practical education :P