News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by bufferoverflow on Monday April 21, 2025 @01:32PM (#43754369)
And it doesn't make almost any difference, because other countries are building hume amounts of coal plants. China started 95GW of coal plant construction just last year.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by bryanlarsen on Monday April 21, 2025 @02:45PM (#43755109)
China's coal usage is down 5% in the last 12 months: https://cleantechnica.com/2025/04/20/chinas-coal-generation-...

They're adding coal capacity quickly, but they're lowering the capacity factor of that usage even faster. Those coal plants are peakers that only run when solar & batteries are empty.

Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by jahnu on Monday April 21, 2025 @02:51PM (#43755173)
I think it was on Volts podcast where I heard that many of them are built as political insurance for regional governments who don’t want an angry population if they have an unusually cold winter and a lot of them are going to end up as stranded assets which the population gets way less mad about.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by bryanlarsen on Monday April 21, 2025 @03:13PM (#43755403)
Ironically building coal plants probably helps wean China off coal. They use a lot of coal for heating. But nobody is going to want to switch to a heat pump unless they have reliable electricity.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by dalyons on Tuesday April 22, 2025 @12:23AM (#43759050)
to add, given the governing structure in china, the coal plants don't have to make economic sense. one-party politics would thus prefer to overbuild as a hedge against the population getting mad at them.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by Aloisius on Monday April 21, 2025 @06:35PM (#43757258)
Not in the last 12 months. This quarter compared to a year ago.

It was up 1.5% for 2024 compared to 2023: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/chinas-thermal-power...

Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by LUmBULtERA on Monday April 21, 2025 @02:52PM (#43755189)
China is deploying far more solar generation, at an increasing rate. [0]

Increasingly cheap battery storage, also built in China, is also being deployed rapidly.

It all makes a lot of difference.

[0] https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/02/02/chinas-new-pv-install...

Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by dghlsakjg on Monday April 21, 2025 @02:54PM (#43755203)
It provably does matter.

Western transition away from fossil fuel usage is still a reduction in net fossil fuel usage when compared to no shift at all. In other words fossil fuel usage might still be growing, but it is growing at a slower rate. If we accept that fossil fuel usage should be minmized then it very much matters.

Aside from that; this argument reduces to an exceptionally bad moral stance which is: Someone else is doing bad things, therefore that justifies me doing that bad thing. Or as you might phrase the counter-argument to a young child: just because someone else is littering doesn't mean that it is ok for you to litter.

Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by amanaplanacanal on Monday April 21, 2025 @02:52PM (#43755188)
China also installed way more solar than, for example, the US. Their energy needs are growing quickly as a developing nation.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by CorrectHorseBat on Monday April 21, 2025 @04:00PM (#43755838)
China didn't just install more solar than any other country, they installed more than all other countries combined.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by jandrese on Monday April 21, 2025 @04:35PM (#43756176)
Economies of scale. That's how you win.
Re:Fossil fuels fall below 50% of US electricity for the fir... by Analemma_ on Monday April 21, 2025 @02:52PM (#43755183)
The top-line number doesn't accurately explain what's going on in China: they have a bunch of coal plans, but many of them operate at 10% or less of rated capacity, probably out of a combination of "these are peaker and/or worst-case (i.e. American oil embargo) scenario energy security plants" and old-fashioned deficiencies in central planning. In any case, you should measure coal burned instead of capacity installed, which is leveling off: [1]

[1]: https://www.statista.com/statistics/265491/chinese-coal-cons...