News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by adfm on Monday April 14, 2025 @10:25PM (#43688451)
No skin in the game, but curious to know why any Republican would want to raise taxes. Is this some sort of power play like the tariffs? Feels like they’re ghost riding the economy for the lulz.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by mmooss on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @12:21AM (#43688950)
They don't care about taxes - they are happy to implement regressive taxes that disproportionately burden the middle class and poor, such as sales taxes, Social Security, etc. They just don't want to pay taxes themselves.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by andsoitis on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @12:28AM (#43688985)
> They don't care about taxes - they are happy to implement regressive taxes that disproportionately burden the middle class and poor, such as sales taxes, Social Security, etc. They just don't want to pay taxes themselves.

A very large portion of the country vote Republican, and I would be surprised if they are by and large the most well-off part of the American public.

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by t-3 on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @12:38AM (#43689031)
The voters are not the party and the party is not the party leadership. The actual policies that end up being supported have little-to-nothing to do with the stuff that gets talked about while campaigning, and this only gets more true the further away from the actual voter the position is.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by Aeolun on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @03:07AM (#43689838)
Yeah. You can implement any policy you want if you can always blame the other party for it (and have your voters eat it up).
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by ringeryless on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @03:48AM (#43690081)
These voters were scammed. Many still don't realize or believe this, and they avoid real news for the purpose of keeping faith in the easter bunny they voted for.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by johnnyanmac on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @02:40AM (#43702205)
And you are right... that's why "The Party" instead appeals to "the party" with various single issues (you know all the hot topics) and implement (or perhaps, pretend to implement) those while the real bills "The Party" want are passed under their nosess. "The Party" spends a dollar on "the party" while grabbing hundreds from the vault they all pitched into.

Worked for decades. Not so well when Trump so publicly tanked the economy and snatched one of the 3 untouchable things.

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by pjc50 on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @04:30AM (#43690335)
It's about punishing their enemies.

> Feels like they’re ghost riding the economy for the lulz

Yes. The abstract of "the economy" doesn't matter. The priorities are "owning the libs" on Twitter and other media, and their own personal bank accounts which can benefit from insider trading the tariffs, state-sponsored memecoins and so on.

Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by soundnote on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @08:22PM (#43699992)
Easy, Harvard is essentially a training center for their ideological enemies on top of providing an actual education. They're just putting the boot down and saying stick to teaching instead of implementing and advancing a specific ideology. If taxes are the tools, so be it.
Re:Harvard's response to federal government letter demanding... by johnnyanmac on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @02:43AM (#43702218)
Harvard is a private instutution. If they want to teach underwater basket weaving, there's not much you can do to stop that. Anymore than Trump can raid apple and tell them to start making Androids. I thought a billionaire businessman would understand that much; imagine if Clinton back in the day tried to seize Trump Towers.

And while we long forgotten: don't forget that all of this is illegal. to retract congressionally appropriated funds that were already budgeted. The time to yoink this stuff legally was a month ago.