Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by craftkiller on Monday April 14, 2025 @10:52AM
(#43681964)
With how great speech recognition is becoming, it seems like this is something remote workers could easily discreetly do since our conversations tend to be stationary, through a computer, and with only a small part of our body visible. Just wire up some electrodes to zap you every time the computer detects filler. I'm now seriously considering doing it myself.
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by alex1115alex on Monday April 14, 2025 @11:39AM
(#43682524)
One of our app devs built this recently, but for swearing:
https://youtube.com/shorts/FthRCwn1JuM?si=lC3eWAUI7sV-LL-r
A wearable speech coach would be awesome, though. Detect filler words and give you an alert on your HUD when it detects "uh" "uhm" etc.
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by craftkiller on Monday April 14, 2025 @06:02PM
(#43686798)
Neat! Without the electrodes I don't think it would be effective for me for "uhh" / "uhm". Considering how unconscious filler words are, I think I'd need the immediate unignorable feedback. But you've got all the logic there, it just needs to be made more violent.
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by khafra on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @05:08AM
(#43703188)
How should the speech coach stimulate you when it detects you using a particularly euphonously or impactfully?
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by gcanyon on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @07:40AM
(#43704106)
It would be about as easy, and certainly less painful, to just have a video processor remove and smooth over filler words in real time.
If the filler words are excessive it would slow down the apparent rate of speech, but obviously not the real rate of speech, by definition, since we're only removing words with zero semantic value.
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by sneak on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @03:19PM
(#43709293)
Why are filler words bad? Why do we need to be trained not to use them?
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by physicles on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @08:38PM
(#43711861)
People in this thread point out that filler words make communication less effective, primarily by being distracting.
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by drekipus on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @08:39PM
(#43711863)
if you've got nothing to say, you're just adding noise.
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by sneak on Thursday April 17, 2025 @05:54AM
(#43714765)
Why do we care that much about the SNR of spoken words? Language is inherently quite redundant.
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by drekipus on Thursday April 17, 2025 @07:03PM
(#43723149)
Redundancy is still "signal"
I don't think it's an argument of efficiency but rather the avoidance of noise.
The "ums" isn't redundant, it's not repeating or decorating the conversation. It's filler like static. Stops people from filling the gaps with their own thoughts
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by tomcam on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @01:44AM
(#43701885)
Wonderful story but we must also acknowledge the teacher for going along with it so gracefully
Re:The Ford Executive Who Kept Score of Colleagues' Verbal F...
by jaggederest on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @03:49AM
(#43702642)
All the credit is his, I was just a dumb little punk who didn't know better. Handling it gracefully and making such an astounding change in response.
Originally he'd take 2 minutes to get through his name and phone number on a voicemail, and a few months later you wouldn't even recognize him by how clear and concise he was.