Re:Fastplotlib: GPU-accelerated, fast, and interactive plott...
by qoez on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @03:22PM
(#43336081)
[flagged]
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fastplotlib: GPU-accelerated, fast, and interactive plott...
by dang on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @03:56PM
(#43336409)
"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."
Re:Fastplotlib: GPU-accelerated, fast, and interactive plott...
by qoez on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @04:03PM
(#43336462)
I appreciate the warning and if it's not by claude I apologize, but I do think we should be allowed to express scepticism if things posted are just AI slop (and if we have to fear getting banned or what-have-you as a consequence I genuinely think that's worse for HN long term than the alternative).
Re:Fastplotlib: GPU-accelerated, fast, and interactive plott...
by pvg on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @04:26PM
(#43336643)
If the skepticism is based on nothing but vibes such commentary is functionally equivalent to something the site guidelines ask you to avoid as it is.
Re:Fastplotlib: GPU-accelerated, fast, and interactive plott...
by dang on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @10:31PM
(#43339368)
Don't worry, we wouldn't ban anyone for this. I agree with you that it's a grey area and will take time to work out.
Re:Fastplotlib: GPU-accelerated, fast, and interactive plott...
by fpl-dev on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @03:33PM
(#43336175)
I dunno why you'd say this, neither of us are fans of LLMs and most of this was written before LLMs were a thing :)