News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why 56k Modems Relied on Digital Phone Lines You Didn't K... by Synaesthesia on Thursday March 06, 2025 @04:12PM (#43285126)
Speech compresses really well, with modern techniques you can get it down a lot.

The big issue with analogue landline phone calls is the audio bandwidth is so limited. It's not the full frequency spectrum, most of it it cut off.

Re:Why 56k Modems Relied on Digital Phone Lines You Didn't K... by cosmotic on Thursday March 06, 2025 @07:05PM (#43286312)
For some context, wikipedia has a good table and diagram of codecs that do well at low bitrates, many of which are very old (G.722 from the late 1988, Speex from 2003, Opus from 2012 for a few examples)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_audio_coding_for...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_(audio_format)#Quality_co...

Re:Why 56k Modems Relied on Digital Phone Lines You Didn't K... by numpad0 on Friday March 07, 2025 @01:03AM (#43287679)
I have no problems with Opus or mp3 at low bitrate, in the same way I have no problems with microwaved food. I just think it's crazy that no one is doing 4Mbps audio while we're routinely streaming 20Mbps video as cheap distractions.
Re:Why 56k Modems Relied on Digital Phone Lines You Didn't K... by piperswe on Friday March 07, 2025 @11:03AM (#43291259)
4Mbps audio doesn't really make sense when you can just about perfectly replicate any human-audible sound in ~1.4Mbps

EDIT: I do agree that lossless (or at least high bitrate modern lossy, like 256k Opus which is basically transparent) should be available in many more situations though.