News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by vitajex on Wednesday February 26, 2025 @11:53PM (#43191478)
Dumb question here: How do they know what he googled? Is it a matter of serving Google with a warrant?
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by tbrownaw on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:04AM (#43191522)
Or they searched his computer and it was in the browser history.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by metadat on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:07AM (#43191539)
Maybe they subpoenaed Google for the records of searches from his IP address.

Is that a thing? I don't trust incognito mode when talking to google, that's for sure.

Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by Lich on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:16AM (#43191581)
My understanding is that incognito mode just doesn’t save local browser history. Your ISP and google can still log what you search based on IP or login state.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by tbrownaw on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:27AM (#43191621)
Your ISP can't see it because of TLS. But the search provider will know things.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by eastbound on Thursday February 27, 2025 @01:15AM (#43191820)
Is the IP hidden if I search from my workplace, where there are 250 computers from several startups behind a single IP? (and it’s not a corporate computer) Granted, Google can identify browsers uniquely using fingerprinting, even with Incognito.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by bloomingkales on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:38AM (#43191669)
FISA. All that Patriot Act bullshit is still around most likely, including the secret courts to get secret warrants. It was supposed to be for terrorism, but just about everyone in history warned us over and over that these things get repurposed.

Guantanamo Bay is still around. The legacy of the Bush administration is for real.

Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by wmf on Thursday February 27, 2025 @01:02AM (#43191752)
There's no need to bring up FISA or Guantanamo. Normal criminal cases routinely get warrants from normal non-spooky courts for Google searches.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by refurb on Thursday February 27, 2025 @01:31AM (#43191884)
Yes, it happens all the time.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by jarsin on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:10AM (#43191556)
Search "Snowden CIA google datacenter"
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by tdeck on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:20AM (#43191592)
It's possible they could do it without a warrant

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter

Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by phire on Thursday February 27, 2025 @12:31AM (#43191637)
People are overthinking things.

The court filing says they seized his laptop and phone, and seems to suggest all this information came from examining those devices. The google searches were probably just sitting in his browser history.

Oh, and then the idiot went and bought another laptop the very next day, despite explicit military orders not to. His opsec skills seem to be lacking.

Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by miffy900 on Thursday February 27, 2025 @01:09AM (#43191792)
This is probably exactly what happened. I bet he used Chrome as well. It doesn't really help that Google Chrome keeps history basically forever (on the order of months), even without signing into a Google Account.
Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by instagib on Thursday February 27, 2025 @05:46AM (#43193150)
Depending on who they worked for, they may sign a document that says you will be hacked and monitored for the rest of your life.

Far better than the gag for 40 years or death, whichever comes last document.

Re:U.S. soldier charged in AT&T hack searched "can hacking b... by Clubber on Thursday February 27, 2025 @07:49AM (#43193921)
Technically it's Google's data, so all they have to do is ask. If Google says no, then they get a warrant.