Re:Managers given 200 characters to justify not firing nucle...
by Aeolun on Monday February 17, 2025 @07:22AM
(#43078162)
I honestly prefer that outcome. At least that’d be a reset instead of this infinite downward cycle.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Managers given 200 characters to justify not firing nucle...
by shmobot on Monday February 17, 2025 @07:32AM
(#43078248)
Such resets are sometimes followed by civil wars, economy crashes style "there is no food for tomorrow" and a generational trauma. As the one who has been through it, be careful what you wish for.
Re:Managers given 200 characters to justify not firing nucle...
by ty6853 on Tuesday February 18, 2025 @01:16AM
(#43086600)
Man to man, you and I both know -- if you've really been there -- that while no one hopes for one many thrive on it. GP may well be one of those.
Re:Managers given 200 characters to justify not firing nucle...
by ben_w on Monday February 17, 2025 @09:44AM
(#43079490)
> I honestly prefer that outcome. At least that’d be a reset instead of this infinite downward cycle.
If the USA gets a repeat of the USSR collapse, you're looking at an independent Texas and California (and perhaps Hawaii?) within a few years, 50% GDP loss, proper hyperinflation, infighting over the nuclear arsenal being under federal authority or the authority of whichever state it happened to be physically in at the time, and a 6-7 year reduction in life expectancy.