Re:Show HN: I built an active community of trans people online
by spencerflem on Thursday January 23, 2025 @08:04PM
(#42809597)
Maybe that's how its used now, but it was never the intent, and plenty of people still mean it in the original sense
Re:Show HN: I built an active community of trans people online
by defrost on Thursday January 23, 2025 @07:19PM
(#42809379)
> it's very specifically used as "this belongs to that other group, nobody else can have it". And thus precludes any learning.
Nonsense. Whoever told you that was projecting.
Nothing precludes respectful collaboration and learning, eg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHgdrzgtBik and numerous other examples.
Re:Show HN: I built an active community of trans people online
by mmooss on Friday January 24, 2025 @12:05AM
(#42810691)
For people who are really interested: A big part of the problem is that the black blues musicians were excluded - they were kept out of the mainstream, which created opportunity for people like the RS to cash in on the black artists' music.
For example, imagine if today people of East and South Asian descent were excluded from SV. Then white developers stole their ideas and code, changed a few things and put their own name on it, and cashed in.
Art has many more cultural consequences than for-profit software, of course.
What more would you like? These notes have been played this way before, therefor no other group will ever play them again?
Yes, the exploitation of other (especially minority) cultures is an issue. And that's very much not how "cultural appropriation" is used any more - it's very specifically used as "this belongs to that other group, nobody else can have it". And thus precludes any learning.
It is, in its common use, asking for fully siloed cultures. I don't think humanity benefits from those siloes.