News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by modeless on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @11:44AM (#42713302)
Alcohol causes cancer, should we reenact prohibition? Water is poisonous in large enough doses. Should we ban water?

Nothing in this world is truly free of all risk. We have to make judgement calls with every single substance. Yes, coloring food is a legitimate use with real benefits that we need to weigh against the risks. And we also need to consider the very real costs of enforcement and burden of compliance. Bans are an extreme option that does not come without costs for the government and society.

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by roboror on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @11:56AM (#42713510)
Obviously the problem is that Red no3 is so prevalent and completely unregulated. Alcohol is sold separately and ID is needed to purchase and isn't added to children's food. If the dye was only sold separately in bottles this debate wouldn't be happening.

The water thing is even more unserious so I'll ignore it.

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by interludead on Thursday January 16, 2025 @02:16AM (#42722322)
The difference, I think, is that alcohol is a choice. But having a potentially dangerous dye in a pill you're forced to take is not.
Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by apwell23 on Thursday January 16, 2025 @07:33AM (#42724378)
> alcohol is a choice.

Thousands of ppl die every year from being other end of DUI. I didn't choose to be on the road with ppl who choose to drink. It was forced on me.

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by interludead on Saturday January 18, 2025 @05:25AM (#42747308)
That’s another perspective on alcohol usage
Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by someothherguyy on Thursday January 16, 2025 @05:41AM (#42723712)
This is a silly argument that is often made.

Everyone knows alcohol is a toxin. It is regulated. You have to be of certain age to buy it. It isn't normally in things you consume daily as a secondary ingredient in doses that would be harmful. You can taste it if it is. If you cannot taste it, you can recognize the effects from drinking it.

The dose makes the poison with any substance, that is a base tenant of toxicology. Not many people are unintentionally poisoning themselves with water.

Food and drug regulations save lives. If you want to argue against them, please at least do so in a manner that doesn't rely on absurdist examples.

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by apwell23 on Thursday January 16, 2025 @07:30AM (#42724360)
Its regulation has nothing to do with its cancer causing properties. Why are you even bringing that irrelevant point here?

Who is being absurd now?

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by skeaker on Thursday January 16, 2025 @05:15PM (#42731605)
> Its regulation has nothing to do with its cancer causing properties.

Only because that's so far down on the list of immediate issues it causes.

Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by someothherguyy on Thursday January 16, 2025 @09:47PM (#42733571)
I am not sure you understood my comment. I wasn't calling anyone absurd, and I was using the fact that it is regulated to reinforce the idea that it is a known toxin.
Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by apwell23 on Saturday January 18, 2025 @11:22AM (#42749404)
Alcohol being regulated has nothing to do with it being a "known toxin".
Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by someothherguyy on Monday January 20, 2025 @07:34PM (#42774903)
Yeah, it does.
Re:US Will Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3 in Cereal and Oth... by apwell23 on Tuesday January 21, 2025 @09:48AM (#42780682)
no it doesn't.