News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on More Speech and Fewer Mistakes. Parent comment

Re:More Speech and Fewer Mistakes by JohnMakin on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @03:05PM (#42626768)
It's been trivially demonstrable that the use of "forbidden" terms or swearing can affect your ranking on their algorithms, whether it be displaying your comment, or your post on someone's feed, etc., at least on Meta's platforms. So no matter how "cringe" you may find it, it's done out of some degree of necessity and precisely because of these dumb moderation mechanisms, not out of any misguided, altruistic self censorship.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Speech and Fewer Mistakes by Suppafly on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @03:34PM (#42627110)
>It's been trivially demonstrable that the use of "forbidden" terms or swearing can affect your ranking on their algorithms

Is it though? A lot of this self censorship seems to be a cargo cult thing where people just copy what they've seen other people do and assume it's necessary when it's really not.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Speech and Fewer Mistakes by zahlman on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @08:00PM (#42629717)
>Is it though?

Yes. There are countless stories from Youtube creators who had their videos taken down or demonetized or had to edit and reupload them, because the AI detected that words such as "suicide" were spoken. And it's common knowledge that requests for review are routinely denied (presented as "we reviewed your case and the ruling stands", a judgment often received in less time than the runtime of the video).

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Speech and Fewer Mistakes by Suppafly on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @10:47PM (#42630691)
>There are countless stories from Youtube creators who had their videos taken down or demonetized or had to edit and reupload them, because the AI detected that words such as "suicide" were spoken.

I don't believe you. I've never seen any evidence of that.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Speech and Fewer Mistakes by pests on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @05:30PM (#42628464)
1) Do you honestly think they would add "fuck" to a blocklist but then turn a blind-eye to "fck"? Basic profanity filters on old forum software were more strict.

2) I find it completely inane that you are willing to self-censor yourself for an algorithm. I guess we no longer need a ministry of truth if the people just produced censored content to begin with, right?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:More Speech and Fewer Mistakes by emmelaich on Tuesday January 07, 2025 @08:26PM (#42629890)
I don't think it's a literal blocklist; it's more an correlation algorithmically determined. If the four-letter word is correlated to hate or violence but the three-letter one is not then ... that's all that matters.
[ Parent | on HN ]