Re:Parasitic worms 'manipulate' mantises onto asphalt roads,...
by amelius on Saturday January 04, 2025 @06:15AM
(#42594051)
On the other hand, without saliva the virus cannot spread, and you need water to have saliva.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Parasitic worms 'manipulate' mantises onto asphalt roads,...
by llamaimperative on Saturday January 04, 2025 @09:38AM
(#42594899)
Evolution has already done the math on this
(Or more precisely, it’s already doing the math, and the current answer is that hydrophobia is the better solution [for rabies’ purposes])
Re:Parasitic worms 'manipulate' mantises onto asphalt roads,...
by DontchaKnowit on Saturday January 04, 2025 @02:35PM
(#42597069)
Really that is not how evolution works
Re:Parasitic worms 'manipulate' mantises onto asphalt roads,...
by amelius on Saturday January 04, 2025 @03:26PM
(#42597446)
The particular math used might get stuck in a local optimum ...
Re:Parasitic worms 'manipulate' mantises onto asphalt roads,...
by llamaimperative on Saturday January 04, 2025 @06:51PM
(#42598553)
Possible but unlikely in this case
Re:Parasitic worms 'manipulate' mantises onto asphalt roads,...
by serf on Sunday January 05, 2025 @11:59AM
(#42603092)
without a big genetic assay isn't it virtually impossible to know whether or not the trait (hydrophobia) persisted due to the symptom itself rather than just a correlated advantageous mutation that brought along hydrophobia as a happy coincidence?
if we need to continue the flawed math analogy; evolution has always done pretty imprecise cocktail-napkin math, even if it has been wildly successful at it.