> Arabs in Palestine are descendants of colonizers and settlers enabled by the colonial powers.  

Oh and they didn't even speak the same language, they had to revive it.

Right. Makes sense.

Even if we ignore the fact that claims to land almost TWO THOUSAND years later are insane, even if we ignore the fact that the evidence is a two thousand year old book, claiming that modern day russian and hodgepodge jews from all over europe are descendants of the original inhabitants of the Levant is simply hilarious.

To create a national identity they even had to resurrect a dead language.

And without the UK creating the state of Israel purely as a western colony for geopolitical reasons, this would not be a discussion and so many lives would've been spared.

You think Israel needs to exist as a Jewish majority state because other countries did not accept Jewish refugees (e.g. the US) even though those same countries could and would do so now (at least as much as the Arab countries would for Palestinians).

So just think about that hypocrisy. Either being hated and rejected as refugees justifies a state of a group's own, or it doesn't.

If they do not form a majority in that state, it's not a Jewish state anymore, in that state Jews no longer have the protection of the state, they instead are forced to search protection from the state.

It's simple and clear as that. It is also becoming more and more clear that your motivation is simply hatred toward Jews that you are trying to hide with these logical fallacies and simply lying.

Palestine, particularly the Occupied Palestinian Territory, would be the obvious answer.

The footage going back many decades of their treatment by "neighbours" is savage.