News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by ivanjermakov on Saturday December 28, 2024 @03:39PM (#42534472)
All that and a single paragraph about ergonomic split keyboards? What a shame. Imo, the main reasons to get into mech keyboards are customization and programmability. This subreddit is a good starting point: https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by mlloyd on Saturday December 28, 2024 @03:44PM (#42534521)
Thanks for this! I use a Perrix 835 and I'm quite happy with it except that the keys are rubbing raw and I need new key caps. But I'm always looking to trade up if possible.
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by pabloescobyte on Saturday December 28, 2024 @05:23PM (#42535341)
There's a whole world of custom split keyboard options out there that use switches where it's super easy to buy replacement keycaps. You can get keycaps made of PBT which are long-lasting and have a very high "rub" factor so you shouldn't have to worry about rubbing them raw for a very long time.
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by AceJohnny2 on Saturday December 28, 2024 @04:53PM (#42535118)
Yes! I don't really understand the appeal of mechanical keyboards. I mean sure, they're a step up from cheap-ass rubber-dome defaults, so it's worth people discovering there are options.

But for me, most mechanical keyboards are downright painful to use. The standard rectangular layout is bad for my wrists, the keypress depth is bad for my fingers, clicks are just plain annoying.

Perhaps decades of keyboard use has worn my wrists and fingers down or helped me define what I wanted, but it's split low-profile or bust.

And there's a dearth of such options on the market. Slowly rising, but a paltry fraction of the overall "mechanical"/custom keyboard market, especially as it comes to keycaps!

Maybe I should just grab the bull by the horns and mod a Microsoft Sculpt to be wired, whose only downside is unreliable wireless.

/rant

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by eviks on Saturday December 28, 2024 @10:45PM (#42537337)
There are non-clicky keys!
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by AceJohnny2 on Sunday December 29, 2024 @01:32AM (#42538100)
oh yeah, in fact I find it hilarious that clicky keys just have an extra lever just for the click sound. It's not part of the actuation mechanism! I have a Giant Kailh from Novelkeys which is interesting to see the construction of a switch.
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by eviks on Sunday December 29, 2024 @01:39AM (#42538135)
indeed, of all the things to preserve from the bad designs of the past...
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by fernmyth on Saturday December 28, 2024 @11:50PM (#42537614)
I’m quite happy with my Perixx Periboard 335 replacing the Microsoft Ergo Sculpt. Standard layout, semi-split, tented, low (-ish) profile, mechanical switches, wired.

Took me a lot of searches to find something meeting my requirements

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by motorest on Sunday December 29, 2024 @01:55AM (#42538187)
> But for me, most mechanical keyboards are downright painful to use. The standard rectangular layout is bad for my wrists, the keypress depth is bad for my fingers, clicks are just plain annoying.

I think you're conflating things. The "mechanical" in "mechanical keyboard" refers to the key switches. That's it. Then you have unrelated traits such as customization,which can express in using fancy/functional keycaps, feel/keypress experience, and whatever you can imagine and throw at a keyboard. None of your complains refer to mechanical keyboards in particular.

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by AceJohnny2 on Sunday December 29, 2024 @04:00AM (#42538677)
My point is that the majority of the mechanical keyboard scene/market is occupied by very traditional (if cut down, in the case of the Any% ones) layout and key types.

For a scene that is so into customization, it's disappointing how much it sticks to bad choices.

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by motorest on Monday December 30, 2024 @01:48AM (#42547123)
> My point is that the majority of the mechanical keyboard scene/market is occupied by very traditional (if cut down, in the case of the Any% ones) layout and key types.

You need to pay attention to what you're saying, because you're referring to different things with unrelated words. If you look at what you're saying, you're talking about custom keyboards. Not mechanical keyboards. Custom keyboards. You even called it a "scene". You're talking about people who buy gear and assemble/modify it to fit their taste. What choice of switches they use is irrelevant. Heck, are you still talking about mechanics keyboards if someone switches cherry MX switches with Topre ones?

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by layer8 on Monday December 30, 2024 @06:07PM (#42554613)
I share your experience. I can recommend the discontinued Microsoft LXM-00001 (the Sculpt wasn’t quite for me), which is wired, if you can find leftover stock, or if Incase finally manages to resurrect it [0].

[0] https://www.zdnet.com/article/fan-of-microsofts-windows-pc-a...

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by pabloescobyte on Saturday December 28, 2024 @05:21PM (#42535324)
It's an article written by a mainstream site so I wasn't really expecting them to talk about split keyboards at all but I agree wholeheartedly.

I went from a full size to a 40% keyboard to an ortholinear and now use a low-profile split keyboard as a daily driver.

IME it's so much better for ergonomics with a proper desk setup and seating/posture with the split halves shoulder width apart. Wireless is a great benefit as well if you swap between desktops and laptops.

Open source firmware like ZMK and QMK make it trivial to use splits with Linux, mac OS and Windows and for any environments where the OS is locked down and software installation is required.

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by mastazi on Saturday December 28, 2024 @05:25PM (#42535357)
Are there split keyboards that preserve the standard layout of the home/end/pgup/pgdown cluster? Due to my usage patterns, not having that is a deal breaker for me. As an example, with rectangular keyboards my only choices are tenkeyless or full size, because they preserve the home cluster. Are there equivalents in the split keyboard world? All I'm seeing in that subreddit are smaller keyboards that lack the home cluster, that's why I ask.
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by WesleyLivesay on Saturday December 28, 2024 @10:15PM (#42537156)
I think the Ergodox ez does those keys better than a standard keyboard because they are split between the two thumb clusters in the standard layout. Don't even have to move my hands to hit any of the four keys. It was one of the things I was looking for in a keyboard.
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by 3eb7988a1663 on Saturday December 28, 2024 @11:35PM (#42537552)
Does seem like a white whale. Nearly all of the split keyboards want to do something different. I just want to stop scrunching my shoulders and space out my arms. Give me a fully traditional keyboard with all of the keys, just with a split down the middle.

My non-QMK keyboard has a horrendous home+end location, which I only realized after I acquired the thing. I did not realize how much I rely on those keys in normal programming.

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by adrian_b on Sunday December 29, 2024 @03:05PM (#42542582)
For a very long time and until now, there have been models of Microsoft Ergonomic Keyboards, with all the classic PC keys, just with a split layout of the keys.

I have used such keyboards for many years and I have been content with them, even if a couple of years ago I have switched to a more compact completely split keyboard, without a separate digit pad (for 2 reasons, a closer position of the pointing device and easier transport in my luggage, due to its smaller total size, to be able to also use it instead of the non-ergonomic laptop keyboard).

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by 3eb7988a1663 on Sunday December 29, 2024 @08:41PM (#42545537)
Unless I am mistaken, the Microsoft versions are all single slabs of hardware with a slight space between the halves. By split keyboard, I want two separate pieces of hardware I can arbitrarily position to fit my body. I maintain a solid 12 inches(30 cm) between the pieces on my desk.
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by adrian_b on Monday December 30, 2024 @04:22AM (#42547840)
If you want completely separate halves, with the 104/105-key formats the right-hand part would be much larger than the left-hand part, which is inconvenient when you want to move or transport it.

You can achieve the same effect in a more convenient way by buying any of the many keyboards with separate parts for the hands, together with a separate numeric pad, which contains the third part of a classic 104/105-key keyboard.

The only remaining difference from the classic format is that on such keyboards the home-end and PgUp-PgDn key pairs are typically on the same vertical column at the right edge of the keyboard, instead of being side-by-side, but it is easy to become accustomed to this arrangement, which actually makes them easier to reach.

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by eviks on Saturday December 28, 2024 @11:46PM (#42537603)
Why not have home/end near home row with a right thumb modifier instead?
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by beacon294 on Sunday December 29, 2024 @01:35AM (#42538111)
The Q14 preserves some similar placement but not all. The Q13 has 4 configurable keys in the top right.

https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q14-max-alice-lay...

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by delecti on Sunday December 29, 2024 @01:49AM (#42538161)
I can't vouch for its quality, but this has the full standard layout of those buttons (plus insert/delete). https://www.amazon.com/EPOMAKER-Mechanical-Swappable-Program...

I've also really enjoyed my Keychron Q11. It only has 5 of those keys (I remapped them a bit because I find "end" more useful than "insert"), and have adjusted quite easily. Relative to the default, I've got Home/End where Ins/Del are, Del for PgUp, and PgUp/Dn where it has PgDn/Home. That was all painless to change in the mapping tool. https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q11-qmk-custom-me...

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by lelanthran on Sunday December 29, 2024 @04:29AM (#42538824)
> Are there split keyboards that preserve the standard layout of the home/end/pgup/pgdown cluster?

There used to be. I have a Microsoft keyboard[1] that works just fine using a PS2 <-> USB connector. Unfortunately I lost the PS2 <-> USB connector (which, IIRC, was an active converter, not a passive one) so I don't use it any more.

I use a standard mechanical keyboard with the standard US layout, and have not noticed any discomfort after 25 years or daily driving the standard layout.

[1] This particular one - first gen model: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_ergonomic_keyboards#... - although if you browse that entire page you'll see that there are newer models.

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by lawn on Sunday December 29, 2024 @04:54AM (#42538930)
Why not create a "navigation layer" where you can have your home/end/pup/pgdown and arrow keys, right below your fingers?

That's the usual way people use these smaller keyboards, and it's way superior in my opinion.

Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by peterbecich on Sunday December 29, 2024 @04:01AM (#42538683)
Two thumbs up for the Iris keyboard, typically purchased as a kit: https://keeb.io/collections/iris-split-ergonomic-keyboard
Re:Ars Technica guide to mechanical keyboards by user_7832 on Sunday December 29, 2024 @08:20AM (#42539775)
I’d also add r/olkb for ortholinear keyboards and r/ergomechcomputers for those pushing ergo keyboards to their logical conclusion.

Side note, the BFO-9000 looks glorious.