News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs?. Parent comment

Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by akoboldfrying on Monday December 23, 2024 @07:54PM (#42498820)
The author is proposing that the DAG representation be in addition to the PDF:

>The organizations drafting guidelines should release them in structured, machine-interpretable formats in addition to the downloadable PDFs.

My opinion: Ideally the PDF could be generated from the underlying DAG -- that would give you confidence that everything in the PDF has been captured in the DAG.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by maxerickson on Monday December 23, 2024 @08:10PM (#42498899)
You could generate the document from the graph and then attach it as data.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday December 24, 2024 @04:17AM (#42500706)
> could generate the document from the graph and then attach it as data

Much easier for doctors to draft PDFs than graphs.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Are Cancer Guidelines Stuck in PDFs? by seb1204 on Tuesday December 24, 2024 @02:59PM (#42504481)
I have not drafted a PDF myself and I doubt doctors will. They work in a text writer or spreadsheet application and then export or print to PDF would be my guess. An interactive interface could spit out the PDF with the decision three in the end. This solution would still mean the decision tree source is in some software package.
[ Parent | on HN ]