GPT-5 is behind schedule

Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule by discreteevent on Monday December 23, 2024 @03:57AM (#42492939)

> Most people don't even know any experts personally, much less have one they could call for help on demand.

Most people can read original sources.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule by signatoremo on Monday December 23, 2024 @06:36AM (#42493676)

Which sources? How do I know I can trust the sources that I found?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule by brookst on Monday December 23, 2024 @07:43AM (#42494005)

And yet here you are making an unsourced claim. Should I trust your assertion of “most”?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule by a1j9o94 on Monday December 23, 2024 @08:26AM (#42494218)

How do you even know what original sources to read?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule by skydhash on Monday December 23, 2024 @01:30PM (#42496528)

There's something called bibliography at the end of every serious books.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule by ben_w on Monday December 23, 2024 @05:23PM (#42498090)

I am recalling CGP Grey's descent into madness due to actually following such trails through historical archives: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEV9qoup2mQ

Kurzgesagt had something along the same lines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgo7rm5Maqg

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule by TeMPOraL on Monday December 23, 2024 @09:15AM (#42494501)

They can, but they usually don't, unless forced to.

(Incidentally, not that different from LLMs, once again.)

[ Parent | on HN ]