Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule
by discreteevent on Monday December 23, 2024 @03:57AM
(#42492939)
> Most people don't even know any experts personally, much less have one they could call for help on demand.
Most people can read original sources.
Re:GPT-5 is behind schedule
by signatoremo on Monday December 23, 2024 @06:36AM
(#42493676)
Which sources? How do I know I can trust the sources that I found?
And yet here you are making an unsourced claim. Should I trust your assertion of “most”?
How do you even know what original sources to read?
There's something called bibliography at the end of every serious books.
I am recalling CGP Grey's descent into madness due to actually following such trails through historical archives: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEV9qoup2mQ
Kurzgesagt had something along the same lines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgo7rm5Maqg
Most people don't even know any experts personally, much less have one they could call for help on demand. Meanwhile, the unreliable, occasionally tripping pseudo-experts named GPT-4 and Claude are equally unreliably-expert in every domain of interest known to humanity, and don't mind me shoving a random 100-pages long PDF in their face in the middle of the night - they'll still happily answer within seconds, and the whole session costs me fractions of a cent, so I can ask for a second, and third, and tenth opinion, and then a meta-opinion, and then compare&contrast with search results, and they don't mind that either.
There's lots to LLMs that more than compensates for their inherent unreliability.