News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on ChatGPT Search. Parent comment

Re:ChatGPT Search by TeMPOraL on Thursday October 31, 2024 @05:04PM (#42011494)
Not anymore. There's arguably more than enough data to form a base for strong LLMs; extra data is nice, but doesn't have to come in such quantity.

(In fact, there's value in trying to filter excess crap out of existing training sets.)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ChatGPT Search by jsheard on Thursday October 31, 2024 @05:06PM (#42011513)
We're talking about LLM-driven search engines here, the assumption is that they will always need up-to-date information. A "strong LLM" can't give you to latest on the presidential election if its knowledge cut-off is in 2023, so these companies "solution" is to scrape today's New York Times and get the LLM to write a summary.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ChatGPT Search by whiplash451 on Thursday October 31, 2024 @05:18PM (#42011632)
You still need fresh data for many use cases.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ChatGPT Search by theappsecguy on Thursday October 31, 2024 @05:14PM (#42011583)
Uh, sorry what?

What happens when you need to search something new? Just hallucinations all the way down?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:ChatGPT Search by HDThoreaun on Thursday October 31, 2024 @06:53PM (#42012362)
LLMs arent embodied. They can not break news as they have no ability to gather fresh news
[ Parent | on HN ]