This analogy is completely off. A closer analogy is someone calls you on your phone letting you know they're here. You were expecting them, so you say "come on in." But, they were at the back door instead of the front door. I don't think anyone would consider that your friend did something illegal.

Yeah, the CFAA doesn't work by analogy unfortunately.

CFAA has recently (2021) been limited by Van Buren ruling.

The entire US legal system works by analogy.

There is a carve out if the data is "publicly available": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HiQ_Labs_v._LinkedIn

If I open the Safeway app and it fetches what is available in a given store without any authentication and everyone sees the same data, that could possibly fall under that exemption.

If my browser is downloading some data, then what’s the difference if my AI agent is doing the same? I’ll even tell you it’s my browser. Who are you to say what qualifies as a browser?

The law will say what qualifies as a browser.

Computer programmers are not legal experts lol. The law is not a program.

The difference between you accessing it and a computer accessing it makes these things different.

A browser is a user agent, it's some software that makes requests to a server and renders them in a way I can understand. There's no difference between using a screen reader to vocalize content and using an AI agent to summarize it.

Sigh and now you're arguing with me instead of the law, as if I matter.

Bits have color and if you don't know what that means, Google that before responding.

I think this is the reference but I'm too lazy to get a TLDR https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24917679

Just have the AI use the browser.

Likely a judge or jury will decide. Law isn’t code.

If it’s two different things then it’s not the same thing.