Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @11:02PM
(#41921347)
I do not get your point.
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @11:08PM
(#41921385)
Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @12:48AM
(#41921919)
> Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?
Yes. That is my point
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @10:49AM
(#41925604)
Make the money = reasonable
Destroy the world = unreasonable
Nobody is saying the second but you. They are unrelated, hence the non sequitur.
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:28PM
(#41927917)
> Destroy the world = unreasonable
Burning tonnes of carbon in your private jet
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:37PM
(#41928003)
How much carbon do you think is reasonable? Do you think it matters if they offset it?
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @08:20PM
(#41930619)
> How much carbon do you think is reasonable?
Zero for your private jet
> Do you think it matters if they offset it?
What does that even mean, if not crooked lies and imaginary foolishness?
Non sequitur. A college student having a pet can be reasonable. That doesn't mean they can do whatever they like with it.