News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @09:00PM (#41920488)
> He changed the world, so now he gets to burn it?

Non sequitur. A college student having a pet can be reasonable. That doesn't mean they can do whatever they like with it.

Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by worik on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @11:02PM (#41921347)
I do not get your point.
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @11:08PM (#41921385)
Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @12:48AM (#41921919)
> Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?

Yes. That is my point

Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @10:49AM (#41925604)
Make the money = reasonable

Destroy the world = unreasonable

Nobody is saying the second but you. They are unrelated, hence the non sequitur.

Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:28PM (#41927917)
> Destroy the world = unreasonable

Burning tonnes of carbon in your private jet

Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:37PM (#41928003)
How much carbon do you think is reasonable? Do you think it matters if they offset it?
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @08:20PM (#41930619)
> How much carbon do you think is reasonable?

Zero for your private jet

> Do you think it matters if they offset it?

What does that even mean, if not crooked lies and imaginary foolishness?