News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, Musk. Parent comment

Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @11:08PM (#41921385)
Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @12:48AM (#41921919)
> Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?

Yes. That is my point

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @10:49AM (#41925604)
Make the money = reasonable

Destroy the world = unreasonable

Nobody is saying the second but you. They are unrelated, hence the non sequitur.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:28PM (#41927917)
> Destroy the world = unreasonable

Burning tonnes of carbon in your private jet

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:37PM (#41928003)
How much carbon do you think is reasonable? Do you think it matters if they offset it?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ... by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @08:20PM (#41930619)
> How much carbon do you think is reasonable?

Zero for your private jet

> Do you think it matters if they offset it?

What does that even mean, if not crooked lies and imaginary foolishness?

[ Parent | on HN ]