Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @09:00PM
(#41920488)
> He changed the world, so now he gets to burn it?
Non sequitur. A college student having a pet can be reasonable. That doesn't mean they can do whatever they like with it.
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @11:02PM
(#41921347)
I do not get your point.
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @11:08PM
(#41921385)
Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @12:48AM
(#41921919)
> Why does something being reasonable to have mean it’s okay to destroy it?
Yes. That is my point
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @10:49AM
(#41925604)
Make the money = reasonable
Destroy the world = unreasonable
Nobody is saying the second but you. They are unrelated, hence the non sequitur.
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:28PM
(#41927917)
> Destroy the world = unreasonable
Burning tonnes of carbon in your private jet
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:37PM
(#41928003)
How much carbon do you think is reasonable? Do you think it matters if they offset it?
Re:Meta Bans Accounts Tracking Private Jets for Zuckerberg, ...
by worik on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @08:20PM
(#41930619)
> How much carbon do you think is reasonable?
Zero for your private jet
> Do you think it matters if they offset it?
What does that even mean, if not crooked lies and imaginary foolishness?
Golly.
He changed the world, so now he gets to burn it?