News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DuckStation by sunaookami on Saturday October 12, 2024 @01:26PM (#41820808)
RetroArch is cancer to the emulation scene. Multiple emulator devs despise RetroArch and users don't like it because of the confusing UI. It's sad that standalone emulators for homebrewed console (e.g. Switch) have gotten so rare "thanks" to RetroArch.
Re:DuckStation by bluescrn on Saturday October 12, 2024 @04:32PM (#41822300)
That 'confusing UI' is fully functional with a game controller, and consistent across many cores.

Which is a massive win when you want to run emulators on devices without mouse/keyboard, and more than makes up for minor performance issues or having out-of-date cores.

Re:DuckStation by recursivecaveat on Saturday October 12, 2024 @06:54PM (#41823436)
I've run many of the underlying emulators' software that got repurposed into cores. I loved XMB on the PS3 and PSP, and I really wish Sony didn't drop it. Retroarch's UI is a complete disaster. It is on the whole the most confusing software I have ever encountered.
Re:DuckStation by Lammy on Sunday October 13, 2024 @12:33AM (#41825165)
That's actually one of my reasons for preferring standalone emulators on Android. My device's hardware L and R work by emulating screen touch, and the touch positions are assigned per-app, so with something like RetroArch it would be a pain to make sure an appropriate L/R target is in the same place for each emulated system.
Re:DuckStation by Shekelphile on Saturday October 12, 2024 @05:27PM (#41822807)
The shittiest part is the RA 'team' (really just daniel) forks the most popular emulators and profits off them while never updating their forks with upstream improvements and never pushing any of the money they profit back to the emudevs doing actual work.

It's really sad that he still hasn't been pushed out yet.

Re:DuckStation by ranger_danger on Saturday October 12, 2024 @05:44PM (#41822946)
They only fork the projects that are extremely difficult to work with the upstream authors of; DuckStation is a prime example.

And I guarantee you nobody on the libretro team is "profiting" off of other emulator projects unless you consider the RetroArch patreon donations to be part of that, but that money often goes back to developers funding bounties and other work/hardware for development... and it exists irrespective of any cores they might support.

The claim that they never update their forks is also demonstrably false. There are some cores that lack a maintainer, but it's not like they are actively being hostile in some way by not updating something. Also keep in mind that they host hundreds of different cores and all the builds for them across a dozen+ platforms, which is thousands of different build combinations, something I've never seen in ANY other single software project on earth (unless you count an operating system I guess). And some people only want to work on certain cores, or just RA.

I think attitudes like this is exactly why nothing ever changes in the emulation scene.

Re:DuckStation by theshackleford on Saturday October 12, 2024 @09:16PM (#41824331)
I like retroarch and I don’t find anything confusing about the RA UI. Sure normies might be confused by its UI but then again they most likely get confused by a start menu.
Re:DuckStation by bigstrat2003 on Saturday October 12, 2024 @09:36PM (#41824438)
I don't find the UI confusing at all, and I like it just fine. Honestly the software works for me so I'm just a quietly happy user.
Re:DuckStation by your_drunk_dad on Sunday October 13, 2024 @11:51AM (#41829021)
Confusing UI for who? Martians? It literally unites many cores under one simple control scheme. Couldn't get any easier than that.