News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by DataDive on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @09:08PM (#41726398)
That's what going "nuclear" looks like ... I guess Mullenweg found out.

Sadly, instead of supporting open source with $5 million, they each will spend 10 million on lawyers.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by csa on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @09:18PM (#41726438)
> Sadly, instead of supporting open source with $5 million, they each will spend 10 million on lawyers.

I think both sides more or less see this as a case of standing up against a bully — they may lose out in the short run (in terms of money), but they think that they will discourage future bullying by fighting back.

I’m not sure if either side is right, but that’s why they both drew a line in the sand, imho.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by dmix on Thursday October 03, 2024 @12:02AM (#41727272)
Ignoring the executive drama (on both sides) it is in bad taste to build WPEngine off an Open Source project and barely contribute back to it.

It's probably a case where their version is so heavily customized they don't spend much time on the fundamentals. But still. I wonder if that had a petty rationale as well. Relationships are important in business.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by initplus on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:22AM (#41727578)
Harder to justify contributing back when the open source project is so tightly coupled to your biggest for profit competitor.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by busterarm on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:44AM (#41727673)
It's so funny seeing on this board how much people hop up and down screaming about big cloud providers are stealing from open source creators and how we should switch to non-open licenses that prevent companies from profiting from other companies' open source projects...

...and then exactly when a company is profiting from someone's open source project and that person is crying foul, the whole board is piling on the creator of that project primarily because they don't like _his tone_.

Bunch of hypocrites.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by onli on Thursday October 03, 2024 @04:43AM (#41728616)
HN isn't one person. There was always a lot of criticism of those closed source licenses. See for example the thread when Redis fell, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39772562
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by immibis on Thursday October 03, 2024 @05:37AM (#41728956)
WPEngine contributed a lot to WordPress. It was, in fact, one of the biggest sponsors of the conference it was just banned from participating in. It also wrote the most popular plugin.

When Matt says "contribute" he means monetarily. Probably (speculation) because his company is about to be bankrupt without finding a way to get more money.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by echelon on Thursday October 03, 2024 @06:13AM (#41729144)
Matt shouldn't have made his thing "open source" [1], just like Elastic and other vendors shouldn't have allowed Amazon to set up shop and steal their work.

Unrelated organizations coming in, soaking up all the profit, and not contributing back is horrible. "Open source" needs to be amended to prevent this.

Something like MAU, MRR, or market% seems like a healthy way to limit big time corporations from taking over.

[1] Hindsight is 20/20.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by Kye on Thursday October 03, 2024 @08:57AM (#41730358)
He had no choice. It was a fork of b2.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by photomatt on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:03PM (#41726633)
Silver Lake and WPE's legal attacks may impact my ability to provide free services on WordPress.org in the future, especially things like Slack or forums that are grounds for discovery. I hope not, though. Going to fight this with everything I have.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by aimazon on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:10PM (#41726671)
Matt, I mean this sincerely: get yourself checked out. Do you have a carbon monoxide detector in your house? You're behaving so manically that it's hard to come up with a reason for this sort of behaviour unless there's something medical going on. The barely-veiled threats to take down WordPress.org (did you forget Cloudflare offered to host it for free?) aren't a rallying cry, they're a last gasp. WordPress is your life's work, don't ruin your meaningful contributions to the world. Go to a 10 day silent retreat, or buy a ranch in Montana and host your own Burning Man... anything but this. You're making a bunch of anti-establishment nerds side with Private Equity, that's how bonkers your behaviour is.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by photomatt on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:25PM (#41726759)
Thanks, I carry a co2 and carbon monoxide monitor. Co2 where I'm at is 572.

I do own a place in Montana, and I meditate several times a day. I have not threatened to take down WordPress.org. WPE's preservation requests do complicate things, legally, though, for the Slack and forums that W.org offers.

Both Cloudflare and Fastly have reached out offering CDN services to W.org, which we're considering. Cloudflare also serves a lot of WP Engine. We do like controlling our infrastructure, though, for a variety of reasons, and have run it without problems or downtime for 21 years. Currently the only outside vendor we use is Slack/Salesforce, which donates free Slack Pro accounts for 49k users. (I think that would cost ~5M/yr.) We also use some Github, which is free for open source.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by bigiain on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:48PM (#41726877)
You do realise just how guilty people sound when complaining about preservation requests for discovery during lawsuits?

If you're "right" and "on the side of good and freedom", what are you worried about in Slack/forums/whatever?

Because everything made public so far in their filing is pretty fucking bad (for you), I can only assume that discovery is gonna reveal some even worse behaviour on your part - or you'd have responded in public with some of that instead of whining about "preservation requests complicating thing"...

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by cdolan on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:05PM (#41726979)
For you:

See paragraphs 32 and 33

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by bigiain on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:29PM (#41727109)
Yeah. I foresee a possible hilarious outcome here.

Matt wins this case, having the court determine the trademarks are "worth" so much that WPEngine - one out of thousands of WP hosting companies - owes licence fees of 10mil per year. Lets ballpark that at a billion dollar a year in licence fees worth of revenue, maybe 5 or 10 billion value.

The IRS then steps in and "Al Capones" Matt and Automattic for tax evasion by moving billions of dollars of assets between a non profit and a for profit company without disclosing or paying tax on it. IRS wins punitive damages, wipes out every company asset Matt's ever been involved with.

WPEngine and Silver Lake buy the remains of these companies (including the trademarks) at fire sale prices.

Everybody loses.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by kstrauser on Thursday October 03, 2024 @12:04AM (#41727285)
Whoa. I’m bookmarking this for later. That seems way too plausible to my not-a-lawyer ears.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by anon7000 on Thursday October 03, 2024 @12:47AM (#41727467)
I think it was explained elsewhere, but Automattic has the commercial trademark rights, so licensing money wouldn’t be transferred to a non-profit foundation.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by metamichael on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:26AM (#41727597)
And the WordPress Foundation isn't being sued either. So the trademark wouldn't be up for grabs either way. It's just a bunch of laymen LARPing lawyers.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by bigiain on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:16AM (#41727559)
Yeah, but according to the filing, Matt had Automattic transfer the ownership of the trademarks to the foundation, they had the foundation grant the exclusive licence back to Automattic.

If those trademarks are asserted to be worth billions, there are presumably reporting and tax obligations for both the ownership transfer and the licence grant agreement.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by metamichael on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:34AM (#41727634)
WordPress Foundation: Owns the trademark

Automattic: Owns the commercial right to use and sell the license

This is done because the WordPress Foundation is non-profit. The legal intricacies of this have been worked out a long time ago. You want to use the WordPress license? Then you'll have to buy it from Automattic.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by re-thc on Thursday October 03, 2024 @08:33AM (#41730146)
> The legal intricacies of this have been worked out a long time ago.

Doesn't sound like. Most people are still confused.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by busterarm on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:49AM (#41727686)
WPEngine isn't just one out of thousands of WP hosting companies. They're an absolute juggernaut dwarfing everyone else.

It's like saying AWS is one of dozens of cloud providers. The sad thing is that there are FAR BETTER WP hosting services out there, like Pantheon.io, and the majority of the WordPress community does not even know that they exist.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by bdurette on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:13PM (#41727031)
It's "GitHub" not "Github." Capital-h-dangit.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by GrinningFool on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:45PM (#41732973)
A decade and a half ago it was "BlackBerry" not "Blackberry". Now get off my grassy hill.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by ValentineC on Thursday October 03, 2024 @02:01PM (#41733148)
For the sake of explaining this thread, the parent was making a WordPress reference:

https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/functions/capital_...

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by dboreham on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:27AM (#41727602)
> I do own a place in Montana

Did not know that.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by lolinder on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:08PM (#41726660)
> Going to fight this with everything I have.

Your chance to do that was before you threw a grenade into the WordPress ecosystem and injured hundreds of thousands of innocent WordPress developers over a {trademark|giving back|general bad vibes} dispute. No one here is buying your attempts to pawn responsibility for your actions off onto WP Engine.

They may have legitimately been the bad guys until a month ago, but you've thoroughly stepped into that role now and you're making no effort to step back.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by metamichael on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:18AM (#41727566)
Why are you blaming this on Matt? WP Engine could've diffused this situation from the very beginning. It's WP Engine's responsibility to provide their customers with a secure hosting environment, not Matt's.

WP Engine is not entitled to any service provided or distributed by the Matt or the WordPress Foundation.

WP Engine and their owners, Silver Lake, are setting a dangerous precedent by refusing to contribute and getting away with it. And the only way for Matt to stop this cancer from spreading is to hit them where it hurts: their bottom line, which means their clients.

You can cry for the lost lives of "compassionate and dedicated fathers" who fought against the Alliance during World War II. It doesn't mean that the USA was wrong when attacking Normandy. Likewise, Matt isn't wrong here.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by lolinder on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:54AM (#41727710)
I'm not going to engage with brand new accounts on this thread. It's nothing personal, but there are way too many of them posting here and it's too hard to distinguish sincere questions from sock puppets.

If you're legitimately new to HN, welcome! I hope to see you around engaging with other topics.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by snowwrestler on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:16PM (#41726696)
I don't think folks want you to provide those free services, is the thing. I think most folks want those housed inside a foundation that can seek industry support in the normal ways. A lot of people seem to have thought they already were.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by bigiain on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:16PM (#41727040)
As I see things, WPE's legal _responses_ to being attacked by you are what's going to grind your ability to provide "free services" into the ground.

All of WordPress's reputation and goodwill transformed into luxury cars and 3rd holiday chalets for lawyers...

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by zambiboy on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:50PM (#41726888)
First, stop talking about this publicly for the love of god.

Second, consider that you may be going through a midlife crisis, and projecting it onto this issue as a struggle for your LIFE's work. This midlife transition and maturing is perfectly normal, its largely hormonal and psychological, and it provides a chance for a person to review his or her life, making some people properly do that and making some people react strongly by rejecting to do that. It does feel like you are doing the latter by identifying yourself with Wordpress and taking this incident as an assault on your persona.

You are not Wordpress. You are a person called Matt, who has infinite facets in him like any other person and like any other person, you just cant be simplified and described by any singular thing, including things like open source projects, like Wordpress. So stop identifying yourself with Wordpress and calling it your 'life's work'. You are just 40 years old for f*ck's sake. Based on the statistics today, your generation has another 50 to go.

Indeed, you have put a lot of time and effort into Wordpress and succeeded in making great positive change with much, much impact. This is great, it is a big success and all of us are grateful for it. But stop identifying yourself with it and projecting your persona onto it and entering into personal fights over it - for that is what this is starting to look like. You will keep existing as who you are with or without Wordpress. Hopefully, you will straighten things up and sort out this matter, learn a few things in the process and do even more contributions to Open Source and Wordpress.

But for now, just stop talking publicly about this, let your lawyers talk, and take some time to reflect on what is written above.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by hashim-warren on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:18PM (#41727048)
This is compassionate and wise
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by tky on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:06PM (#41726993)
Welcome to the fray, and congrats on your reply being wonderfully written. Matt would be wise to take your advice.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by rossant on Thursday October 03, 2024 @03:33AM (#41728157)
Most sensible comment in this whole thread.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by dang on Friday October 04, 2024 @02:54PM (#41744454)
I assume that you're well intentioned but Internet Psychiatric Diagnosis (IPD) counts as a form of personal attack (in effect, if not intent), and therefore not allowed here.

https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&type=comment&dateRange=a...

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by rideontime on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:11PM (#41726677)
Who attacked whom?
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by JimDabell on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:25PM (#41726756)
> especially things like Slack or forums that are grounds for discovery

You know comments here and on Twitter can end up as evidence in court as well, right?

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by curiousgal on Thursday October 03, 2024 @02:16AM (#41727800)
lmfao my dude stop acting like a pariah, it's pathetic. You 100% brought this on yourself. Never thought anyone could be so reckless when extorting people.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by DataDive on Thursday October 03, 2024 @08:24AM (#41730065)
There is a parable that applies here,

---

The donkey, feeling unappreciated, approaches God with a heavy heart.

"Dear God," says the donkey, "why is it that all the other animals mock me, belittle me, and hold me in contempt?"

God listens patiently and replies, "My dear donkey, I understand your pain, but there's nothing I can do."

Surprised, the donkey responds, "But you are God! The all-powerful, creator of all things. Surely you can help?"

God smiles gently and says, "I may have created the world, but even I cannot change public opinion."

---

Matt Mullenweg might feel like God and might be among the most influential and richest people on the planet. But they won't be able to change public opinion, which is without a doubt against them.

I would advise stopping the madness before it is too late.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by jfdndbqirncnx on Friday October 04, 2024 @03:54PM (#41745013)
Matt, the Wordpress Foundation (which you control) explicitly lists the Plugin Repository and Theme Repository as Foundation projects, but now you’re saying that they’re your personal projects: https://wordpressfoundation.org/projects/

You’re a compulsive liar.

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by anonylizard on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @09:19PM (#41726439)
Automattic requested well over $10 million annually from WP Engine, so WP engine would find a lawyer battle cheaper.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by FireBeyond on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @09:29PM (#41726485)
To go to Matt’s for profit entity, for his for profit entity to direct as they wish.

“I demand you give resources to your for profit competitor for them to use as they wish. And I’ll pretend to be wearing my non-profit, independent hat while demanding it.”

Is it any surprise this has gone the way it has?

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by sroussey on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @10:25PM (#41726760)
OR to the non-profit entity.
Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by lolinder on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @11:31PM (#41727126)
The term sheet is here [0], the money option offered was only to Automattic. The other choice was 8% of developer time to WordPress itself, which is arguably under the control of the non-profit, but no one is quite sure at this point what the distinction between the two even is.

[0] https://automattic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/term-sheet...

Re:Filed: WP Engine Inc. v Automattic Inc. and Matthew Charl... by joeyoungblood on Thursday October 03, 2024 @01:57AM (#41727719)
And they demanded full auditing while also making them agree to not fork GPL licensed software. No CEO with even the most basic of business educations would sign this agreement. It's a total farse, he's trying to shut the company down and either doing so for his own benefit or for the benefit of his buddies at Newfold or Blackrock.