Is the opinion, anyway. Nothing wrong with your opinion (or mine), they're just opinions after all, but if I was on my feet all day in the field and needed a laptop, I'd rather something small and light with a long battery life. If I wanted something luggable, I'd go for a usb-c monitor and as small a desktop chassis as would fit a proper GPU inside of a mobile one. But dealing with the cables for that would get old real quick, so a laptop like you describe would be my pick in those circumstances. Eg my friend's a VJ and performs at random clubs and a gaming laptop like you described is the most appropriate device.
The only reason I use it is its battery life. Work provided it; it's not mine and I'd not choose one myself.
For my own, I want a big thick chunky thing with 3 physical mouse buttons, lots of ports, a swappable (and ideally hot swappable) battery and ideally 2 of them.
There's a space for thin'n'light, but there are next to no commercial options for those who want fat'n'flexible.
Same applies to phones.
Why is it I always read the parent opinion when it comes to laptop shopping, but never the opposite (which is mine):
-Bigger -> better
-Thicker -> better
-Terrible battery life
-Desktop CPU and GPU
-Blow torch thermal exhaust
-Maximum storage and RAM
All so I can run lm-studio, having Llama 3 pump out my edgy 4chan shitposts and effortposts for me, within the absolute comfiness of Qubes OS. I couldn't imagine relying on something thin and low powered unless it did very specific things (and, if it can't run Qubes, then it stays offline).