Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by godzillabrennus on Thursday August 29, 2024 @03:59AM
(#41388410)
I think interface change fatigue is real. DisplayPort has been around but there wasn’t a compelling reason to use it when displays had hdmi ports.
People are also looking to USB-C as the next iteration in display connectivity because it does “all of the things” from a consumers perspective.
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by Dalewyn on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:11AM
(#41388484)
Most people will use the path of least resistance.
Many people/organizations still use VGA and ketchup-mustard-onion cables to this day if they still do the job, let alone HDMI.
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by account42 on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:58AM
(#41388760)
Shouldn't it be mayo if you are going with a condiment theme?
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by Dalewyn on Thursday August 29, 2024 @09:11AM
(#41390440)
Very fair point and duly noted!
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by seba_dos1 on Thursday August 29, 2024 @06:58AM
(#41389477)
At least video over USB-C is DisplayPort, so there's hope.
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by atoav on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:31AM
(#41388601)
As a media tech guy (running the media tech department of a university, which includes a DCI conform cinema): absolutely everybody hates HDMI. It is unreliable as hell, both physically and as a protocol. It tries to be too much to too many people and most devices, including expensive "pro" gear includes unchangeable random weirdness like ignoring EDIDs or forcing them onto you, that is documented nowhere and you can only find these things out when you buy it.
Add to that the fact that consumers/users can break the picture/sound in 100 different ways on their devices and you get a veritable support nightmare.
I wish it was just DVI+ but it does so much more.
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by Rinzler89 on Thursday August 29, 2024 @04:50AM
(#41388710)
Isn't this why VGA is still widely used everywhere? It always just works no matter what even when connector or pins are damaged since there's no digital handshake or error correction just a basic analog pipeline.
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by atoav on Thursday August 29, 2024 @06:48AM
(#41389404)
I don't know, at least here (Europe) VGA has pretty much died out in all but legacy applications. The true pro format would be SDI using BNC connectors.
But I guess HDMI is going to be replaced by USB-C in the long run. Especially since the "everything-connector" also doing Video makes more sense than the video-connector also doing everything.
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by paulmd on Thursday August 29, 2024 @12:07PM
(#41392280)
> unchangeable random weirdness like ignoring EDIDs or forcing them onto you, that is documented nowhere and you can only find these things out when you buy it.
FWIW: https://www.store.level1techs.com/products/p/5megt2xqmlryafj...
Re:HDMI Forum rejects AMD's HDMI 2.1 open-source driver
by cardiffspaceman on Thursday August 29, 2024 @01:14PM
(#41393062)
I used a plasma panel, vintage 2004 (retired in 2016 with no noticeable burnin), that had a DVI connector with HDCP support. If it had not supported HDCP, I could not have connected my cable box to this panel.
hdmi was not an alternative to display port, display port did not exist yet. it was an alternative to dvi, really hdmi is dvi with a sound channel and drm. And as much as I dislike the hdmi foundation I can see the benefit here.
as to hdmi vs display port... I have no idea why you don't see more display port, VESA has a proven track record as the nicer standards body, display port is a better system. probably just inertia at this point.