My workplace, for instance, published the formal policy last week and the accompanying announcement was honestly bordering on anger about it. My team is pretty good, but other teams have been having to work out of hours. It's a good change.
That said it is mostly self imposed. Over the past 2 years it was rarely the expectation to work outside regular hours (but did happen).
This is the key. Of course companies don’t object to you working extra hours. You shouldn’t do it - it sets a bad precedent for those who you manage.
literally a page? with a pager?
It's so weird that you automatically assume everyone shares your values about what a "good" company is.
Personally, I think a good company is one where everyone cares about the outcome and is aligned around the mission including sometimes working "after hours" when it's necessary. Treating employment as purgatory is a self-fulfilling prophesy.
By the far the most depressed I've ever been in my professional career was working on a team with great WLB, easy work, and great pay. It felt grossly unfair to the company and I realized I never want to work with colleagues who treat work as a punishment.
The person you were replying to was sharing their opinion on what a "good" company is. I didn't see any assumption that this was objective truth.
And then you shared your opinion. Which you could have done without calling them weird. Which is why you got downvoted.
He said thanks, told me to turn my phone off, and sent a group message to the team reminding us not to work outside hours, with a link to instructions on disabling slack notifications. And then he started scheduling his own overnight/weekend DMs to send at 9am Monday.
It was an awesome response, and those firm self-imposed boundaries helped allow the work to be rewarding, rather than an absolute nightmare.
Two questions: assuming you have fixed hours, does anyone (colleagues, direct supervisor, big boss) expect you to see messages or emails outside of your working hours? Second question: what culture does your answer apply to?
For me the answer is a confident "no", having worked in the Dutch and German tech sector, mainly in small companies
I guess one thing you might say is ‘why is this manager sending emails at such times’ but I think lots of people like the flexibility of working strange hours, eg maybe they tend to wake up very early, or want to fit their work-schedule around some childcare obligations like breakfast or a school run.
As for the second, yes that seems like a given. We send each other messages day and night because of that, but nobody expects a response outside of the recipient's working times
The signature in the email.
The only exception being when I was paid extra to be on call.
Sending that email out of office hours itself is a red flag.
It’s not your job to make sure that others have boundaries.
Being contacted out of hours (notice the absence of the word office) is a no-no unless there's an on call agreement .. and even that has a roster.
There's an unspoken exception for serious accidents that require hands on deck to save lives | recover bodies.
I don't regard sending an email as an issue, it's much like posting a letter - but there's no obligation to read or respond to a work email out of hours (in countries such as Australia).
There's no right-to-disconnect in my country, but sometime this year my boss started putting "I don’t expect a response to this email outside of your normal working hours." on the end of his email signature.
I might not be earning FAANG money, but it's just another sign I'm working for a 'good' company.