Re:Eza: A modern, maintained replacement for ls
by lynndotpy on Monday July 22, 2024 @08:32AM
(#41033655)
This is unnecessary, it's not advertising on Rust. The README directly explains why they describe `eza` as modern. It makes no mention of Rust or memory safety.
Personally, I use eza because of `--tree` and `--git`.
[dead]
Re:Eza: A modern, maintained replacement for ls
by deciduously on Monday July 22, 2024 @08:57AM
(#41033832)
That reaction was your choice, not the project's.
Re:Eza: A modern, maintained replacement for ls
by cafkafk on Monday July 22, 2024 @10:21AM
(#41034736)
fwiw we're glad we're scaring people like that away :p
Re:Eza: A modern, maintained replacement for ls
by djchateau on Monday July 22, 2024 @10:41AM
(#41034989)
You really shouldn't. You're adding to the stereotype that Rust developers are insufferable and not to be collaborated with. Scaring away good developers from your projects is a bad thing, not a good thing.
Re:Eza: A modern, maintained replacement for ls
by nottorp on Monday July 22, 2024 @10:34AM
(#41034906)
Yeah, you only need the true believers :p
Everyone else will be condemned to read and reread the latest C++ standard for all eternity!
Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. [...] Omit internet tropes.
Oh... it's written in Rust.
<clicks away>