If you say it 3 times in front of a mirror, it summons Stallman

With or without the swords?

Only one way to find out!

Haha

It prints "ok" and shows they got in (it relies just on a shell, nothing else).

Why not do 'echo "ok"'?

As shown by someone having to ask what it does, it obscures what it does.

Doesn't seem terribly useful. I mean it only obscures that it prints "ok". If you're looking at the logs, you probably already figured out someone is attacking you, and if you didn't, seeing "echo ok" will not help you figure it out.

If the only thing the command does is "obscure what it does", then the only thing it obscures is "obscure what it does". I guess there's no requirement that whoever writes these scripts is a genuis.

People writing malware generally don't want to deploy it on honeypots, because then they're handing their payload (and other tradecraft) directly to analysts.

So often the first stage is an attempt at honeypot detection, or more broadly, device fingerprinting.

A bad honeypot might not even run a real /bin/sh, and this detects that right off the bat.

That makes a lot more sense than "it obscures the obscure thing it does to obscure itself".

This look like a simple test to see if remote command execution works.

It echos "ok".

Prints out `ok`

Maybe I should create a honeypot where cat, echo, sed, and curl/wget all drop random bytes in all commands they execute

Would be fun

Better would be to just subtly change the output...

Like do a +1 on the byte every 7 bytes. Bonus to do it only on every 7 printable chars.

And you can even do A/B testing on the constant 7.

Tests whether `echo` supports the `-e` option.