Re:Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac
by Nition on Monday June 10, 2024 @06:37PM
(#40640044)
That's a very valid rebuttal to my comment. I think this kind of "force multiplier" use for AI is the most effective one we have right now; I've noticed the same thing with GPT-4 for programming. I know the code well enough to double check the output, but AI can still save time in writing it, or sometimes come up with a strategy that I may not have.
Maybe the fact that you did the dictation together with your child present is also notable. Even though you used the AI, you were still doing an activity together and they see you doing it for them.
Re:Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac
by tkgally on Monday June 10, 2024 @08:31PM
(#40640941)
Meta comment: This back-and-forth between Nition and bredren is one of the best exchanges I’ve read on HN recently. Thanks to both of you.
Re:Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac
by bradgessler on Monday June 10, 2024 @08:42PM
(#40641017)
The best articulation of what the industry is currently calling “AI” is “augmented intelligence”—this wording captures that these are tools that can enhance intelligence, not replace it or come up with its own ideas.
Re:Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac
by baapercollege on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @01:35AM
(#40642751)
In fact, by allowing people to generate photos for birthday wishes, apple is elevating the bottomline not lowering the topline. The person who wants to put in the effort and send a hand-drawn image would often not want to resort to a ready-made machine creation. OTOH, the simple "HBD Mom" sender would now send "Happy Birthday Mom <genmoji>" and an image...
Re:Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac
by s3p on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @10:58AM
(#40646934)
Oh god.. if someone sent me Ai generated slop for my birthday I would be bothered. A simple happy birthday is fine!
Re:Apple Intelligence for iPhone, iPad, and Mac
by solarmist on Tuesday June 11, 2024 @11:22AM
(#40647291)
What about things like GIPHY reactions? I’m guessing you’re not a fan of those either or using quotes from well known people. There shortcuts have existed as long as people have been writing or drawing. They just get easier and more powerful over time.
I view this as just extending that to custom reactions and making them more flexible expanding their range of uses.
We've been building this up for some time, this tiny universe is the most common thing for me to respond to "will you tell me a story?" (something that is requested sometimes several times a day) since it is so deeply ingrained in both our heads.
Yesterday, while driving to pick up burritos, I dictated a broad set of detailed points, including the complete introductory sequence to the story to gpt-4o and asked it to tell a new adventure based on all of the context.
It did an amazing job at it. I was able to see my kid's reaction in the reflection of the mirrors and it did not take away from what we already had. It actually gave me some new ideas on where I can take it when I'm doing it myself.
If people lean on gen ai with none of their own personal, creative contributions they're not going to get interesting results.
But I know you can go to the effort to create and create and create and then on top of that layer on gen AI--it can knock it out of the park.
In this way, I see gen AI capabilities as simply another tool that can be used best with practice, like a synthesizer after previously only having a piano or organ.