I haven't tried Llama 3 yet, but Llama 2 is indeed extremely "safe." (I'm old enough to remember when AI safety was about not having AI take over the world and kill all humans, not when it might offend a Puritan's sexual sensibilities or hurt somebody's feelings, so I hate using the word "safe" for it, but I can't think of a better word that others would understand).

It's not quite as bad as Gemini, but in the same class where it's almost not useful because so often it refuses to do anything except lecture. Still very grateful for it, but I suspect the most useful model hasn't happened yet.

So whereabouts are you that a "Puritan's sexual sensibilities" holds any sway?

I think the point is Silicon Valley is such a place.

"Visible nipples? The defining characteristic of all mammals, which infants necessarily have to put in their mouths to feed? On this website? Your account has been banned!"

Meanwhile in Berlin, topless calendars in shopping malls and spinning-cube billboards for Dildo King all over the place.

Sex macht schön - Dildo King

TO be fair, its one of the most popular terms people search...

So, lets not pretend its something that isnt arousing.

I personally search for lots of things that aren't arousing to me.

Even if it's arousing, who cares?

Ankles were arousing in 1800s Britain. They might still be in some places.

It’s everywhere. The entire USA has been devolving into New Puritan nonsense in many ways since the sexual revolution… which is bizarre.

"Censored" is the word that you're looking for, and is generally what you see when these models are discussed on Reddit etc.

Not to worry - uncensored finetunes will be coming shortly.

You can't really take out the censorship. You can strengthen pathways which work around the damage, but the damage is still there.

If the model doesn't refuse to produce output, it's not censored anymore for any practical purpose. It doesn't really matter if there are "censorship neurons" inside that are routed around.

Sure, it would be nice if we didn't have to do that so that the model could actually spent its full capacity on something useful. But that's a different issue even if the root cause is the same.

GPT-3.5 rejected to extract data from a German receipt because it contained "Women's Sportswear", sent back a "medium" severity sexual content rating. That was an API call, which should be less restrictive.

We are living in a post Dan Schneider world. Feet are off the table.

Well thanks then. Some of us eat on this table you know

I think nsfw stats bursted that bubble, not danny.

Sorry, still too sexy. Can’t have that.