News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose... by whycome on Friday April 12, 2024 @06:15PM (#40018229)
The most infuriating thing is that an article can take absolutely any stance on an issue simply by cherry picking tweets to go along with it.

News has become a weird kind of curation market. And the funny thing about this payment arrangement that publishers want is that they are not paying any of those tweeters who may be breaking the news or themselves curating the info.

Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose... by dylan604 on Friday April 12, 2024 @06:53PM (#40018481)
Why would you pay someone for a tweet? They posted it for free. Collecting tweets isn't journalism. Asking the user for more than 140 chars about what they are witnessing along with multiple others would then be closer to journalism. Tweets are just people self identifying who journalists could be interviewing. The interview allows for follow up to the tweet.
Re:Google threatens to cut off news after California propose... by EasyMark on Saturday April 13, 2024 @12:50PM (#40024319)
If I see tweets in any article other than tweets from the people that the article is about, I will throw that news site in the dust bin. Using tweets as evidence or as anything important tells me that news site is definitely in a death spiral. I think the only place I put up with it is on the local news and even then I'm gritting my teeth.