No, but there the issue is bodily autonomy. Which arguably is much more important a right than free speech.

Is bodily autonomy a recognized right in any sense? Is there a society that actually respects the right to bodily autonomy legally or in practice - meaning, using any drugs at will, the right to suicide, to agree to being eaten by a friendly cannibal, and so on? I don't think there is, and nobody is pushing for it.

The Okapa District, pre missionary, pre kiaps .. you were good to go until the mid 1950s at least .. and then colonizers spread their values.

> to agree to being eaten by a friendly cannibal

They had standards though, you'd have to work to gain the respect for anyone to want to eat you as a mortuary ritual.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FK5N_ObFeQ

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fore_people

There's two parts though:

1. the right to not have someone else do stuff to your body

2. your right to do anything to it

Number 1 is pretty well established.

Number 2 less so, and I think that comes down to us as a society noticing that many people can't be trusted with full access here. Ask any clean addict and they will tell you what a colossal mistake it was to start using the drug in the first place. The regulation of what you can do with your own body is, in my opinion, a regulation to protect future you from present you. Because we all know what the present you has worse impulse control and judgement than future you would like.