The article makes it quite clear this is not what’s happening and not why the systems are in use. They’re being used to generate a target list faster than could be done by traditional methods, and are being used despite agreeing with traditional methods only 90% of the time. They’re being used to accelerate the war, not make it more accurate.

Which one exactly? The guardian article quotes literally hundreds of sources - which ones are you bothered by?

>>the use of technology and AI to minimize civilian casualties in guerrilla warfare.

It achieves literally no such thing, it's dishonest to suggest otherwise.

>>How much civilians did US kill during Vietnam war?

Peak whataboutism. As if everyone on the internet is American or believes that we should be comparing everyone else to America.

In the year 2022 Russia invaded ukraine, flattened two (?) cities, showed no concern for civilian life, committed war crimes.

And yet Israel has killed more children in 6 months than Russia did in 3 years.

Russia killed 4 western aid workers in 2022, Israel already more than that in 1 week, we are suppose to believe these are accidents?

Look at the battles of Grozny for a more apt comparison of Russian urban warfare.

In what universe is that a less biased title? It is just biased in a different direction.