News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Chronicle reporter went undercover in high school by nick7376182 on Friday March 29, 2024 @01:33PM (#39866770)
Keep RSO but get rid of Prop13 on any non-owner occupied buildings. Multi unit buildings that are not individual condos should automatically be voided out of Prop 13 anyways.
Re:A Chronicle reporter went undercover in high school by KerrAvon on Friday March 29, 2024 @02:14PM (#39867224)
They recently got rid of Prop 13 on inherited homes -- apparently because people got real mad at Jeff Bridges for having a second home -- which is currently fucking me over personally because it's taking a long time to prep the inherited property for sale.
Re:A Chronicle reporter went undercover in high school by nick7376182 on Friday March 29, 2024 @02:21PM (#39867311)
Sorry for your loss.

Given that you are selling it rather than rent it out, it seems to have the intended effect. Just as when I renovated a vacant RSO duplex, I sold it rather than enter rent control again.

Incentives do work, but we accidentally incentivised and subsidized a whole bunch of mom and pop landlords with prop 13.

Re:A Chronicle reporter went undercover in high school by bombcar on Friday March 29, 2024 @03:39PM (#39868129)
What is RSO?

The subsidization of mom and pop landlords with Prop 13 basically translates into lower rents overall; without it rents would have to rise (or total rentals decrease, which may be a desirable outcome).

Re:A Chronicle reporter went undercover in high school by dredmorbius on Friday March 29, 2024 @05:29PM (#39869223)
I'm presuming "rent stabilization ordinance", which is specific to Los Angeles, best I can tell:

<https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/los_angeles/latest/lam...>