During an all-hands around 2008 I asked AWS leadership whether AWS was going to open source their technologies the answer was we're thinking about it. 16 years later it has not happened, nor it will given the record ;(
How does one buy rights to an open source technology?
You buy the trademark/name from the original author. I'm the case of GPL or other assigned work licenses, you sell the baseline copyright and they can change it.
Re:The race to replace Redis
by deanCommie on Sunday March 31, 2024 @06:23PM
(#39888642)
> By contrast AWS takes most of the profits whilst contributing relatively nothing back
You do understand that AWS profits not off redis but by offering redis as a managed hosting provider.
Microsoft and Google do to, it's just that they're not as popular as AWS.
They're not re-skinning or re-selling Redis, they're selling a separate product - the managed operations for operating and scaling Redis.
You may not appreciate this (most on HN never do - see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224) But the value is evident to thousands of customers.
Re:The race to replace Redis
by JackSlateur on Tuesday April 02, 2024 @04:57AM
(#39903640)
Do you have some data to back this ?
AWS takes most of the profits whilst contributing relatively nothing back
It appears that AWS and friends are not "leeching" at all, according to the LWN article.
So whilst their previous license allowed AWS to leech off them, it's now been relicensed to prevent them from profiting off their future investments without compensating anything back.