Re:Have We Reached Peak AI?
by jazzyjackson on Monday March 18, 2024 @09:35PM
(#39752137)
give the semantics a rest, I would love to hear a more cogent argument for why microsoft and its shareholders should get to profit from unlicensed data just because they found a way to repackage it into a helpful harmless assistant
[ Parent
| on HN ]
So you're saying that any data, regardless of origin should be licensed. So should we paying dividend to einstien for e=mc2? Or should he have paid dividends to any of the math or physics before him that he used to further humanity? I mean since it's just semantics since he clearly "stole" the e, the =, the m, the c, and the 2.
Re:Have We Reached Peak AI?
by jazzyjackson on Tuesday March 19, 2024 @09:26PM
(#39762089)
math isn't covered by copyright law
really my opinion is copyright should be 7 years from publication date, but whatever it is, i would like for it to be applied equally