Exactly. MSFT is who won here. I highly recommend you all watch OpenAI section of the new ALL-IN Podcast. Sam and OpenAI is in a very bad situation if Elon gets heard by a fair judge.

What, the podcast that is all of Elon’s best friends thinks he has a case? What a surprise!

I don't see the problem here. Are you not able to discern different arguments/ideas and come to conclusions by yourself?

I watched some on a recommendation and used to see some of their ideas on X-Twitter.

One conclusion I came to was that I didn't respect those people's ability to discern or conclude.

Who cares whether you respect their ability to discern or conclude?

Did you get the argument or not, and did it make sense to you in the situation? That's all that matters.

Only a lawyer can really do that in legal cases.

You know how Hollywood gets computers, coding, and hacking wrong? That's how bad non-lawyers are with law.

Or, pertinently to this case — who knows more law: one of us, or ChatGPT?

One of us IANAL folks have one thing ChatGPT doesn't: we don't make up stuff up.

One of the more amusing dismissals of ChatGPT that I've heard is "mansplaining as a service".

We absolutely do make stuff up, we just don't realise we're doing it.

True, absolutely true. At least I hope most lawyers don't make up stuff in court filings, unless they use ChatGPT...

A 'fair judge'? You mean one that applies the law? Most of the experts I've seen say the case has no chance. Or are you saying this is another 4d chess move like what happened with Twitter?

Gentle pedantic OT reminder: "there is no "g" in the phrase "rein in."