Re:OpenAI board reappoints Altman and adds three other direc...
by Timber-6539 on Saturday March 09, 2024 @12:05AM
(#39649522)
I don't see the problem here. Are you not able to discern different arguments/ideas and come to conclusions by yourself?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:OpenAI board reappoints Altman and adds three other direc...
by marshray on Saturday March 09, 2024 @12:33AM
(#39649636)
I watched some on a recommendation and used to see some of their ideas on X-Twitter.
One conclusion I came to was that I didn't respect those people's ability to discern or conclude.
Re:OpenAI board reappoints Altman and adds three other direc...
by Timber-6539 on Saturday March 09, 2024 @01:39AM
(#39649909)
Who cares whether you respect their ability to discern or conclude?
Did you get the argument or not, and did it make sense to you in the situation? That's all that matters.
Re:OpenAI board reappoints Altman and adds three other direc...
by ben_w on Saturday March 09, 2024 @04:24AM
(#39650519)
Only a lawyer can really do that in legal cases.
You know how Hollywood gets computers, coding, and hacking wrong? That's how bad non-lawyers are with law.
Or, pertinently to this case — who knows more law: one of us, or ChatGPT?
Re:OpenAI board reappoints Altman and adds three other direc...
by hef19898 on Saturday March 09, 2024 @05:48AM
(#39650846)
One of us IANAL folks have one thing ChatGPT doesn't: we don't make up stuff up.