News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by refulgentis on Thursday February 08, 2024 @12:33PM (#39304873)
I've never 100% understood it either, the only steelman I've been able to come up with over years is most people are like me and lose or damage the wireless earbuds every 6-12 months. I'm lucky enough to be a yuppie tech nerd with disposable income to treat it as a fact of life. Whereas for them it feels like a forced march to spend $150 every year.
Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by sleepybrett on Thursday February 08, 2024 @12:42PM (#39304989)
> Whereas for them it feels like a forced march to spend $150 every year.

Except that you are not, there exists a 8-10$ dongle from apple for lightning to headphone and, i just had to check, there exists a usb-c to headphone dongle for the same price range if you happen to have the newest gen phone.

So instead it's a forced march to buy a new dongle if you happen to lose your cheap wired headphones/earbuds, assuming you just leave the dongle attached to the headphones/earbuds.

Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by recursive on Thursday February 08, 2024 @03:18PM (#39307096)
I don't like dongles. It's another piece. It plugs into the same place the charger does.
Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by abhinavk on Thursday February 08, 2024 @01:01PM (#39305237)
Everything else aside, the DAC in Apple's USB-C/Lightning-to-3.5mm adapter is phenomenal for the price.
Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by refulgentis on Thursday February 08, 2024 @01:06PM (#39305332)
Sure -- do you want me to steelman that too? (TL;DR: 'forced purchase' and 'can't use your stuff' effects still play in)
Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by sleepybrett on Thursday February 08, 2024 @01:17PM (#39305469)
'forced purchase' is much different when its $8 and not $150 (and let's be clear you can get bluetooth headphones and earbuds for well under $100 at this point). Let's also remember that when apple made this change originally they packed in earpods w/ lightning connectors.

I can understand some grousing when the headphone jack was removed. I can't understand grousing still almost 8 years later. Buy the phone or don't buy the phone, they clearly aren't going to add the jack back.

Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by bigstrat2003 on Thursday February 08, 2024 @01:28PM (#39305594)
I hate wireless headphones because they are a strictly worse product. They cost a lot more, can be lost, and need to be charged. But the only advantage they offer (being wireless) isn't actually useful. So I use wired headphones, because they are flat out better in every way that matters.
Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by DiggyJohnson on Thursday February 08, 2024 @01:56PM (#39305985)
Not having a wire is an obvious advantage, even if the negatives you listed are true. Obviously this only applies to me, but having to avoid yanking or catching me headphone cord significantly impacted my range of motion if I was doing anything other than walking or sitting down.
Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by ghostpepper on Thursday February 08, 2024 @02:12PM (#39306177)
Indeed Apple AirPods are such a step above in usability of even other wireless headphones, let alone wired, that they're almost a separate product category.

They're so much better than what we had before that once you've used them for a few days it's hard to go back.

Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by a1o on Thursday February 08, 2024 @03:33PM (#39307299)
I have AirPods Pro but ended up prefering the Samsung Galaxy Buds (had many different iterations of them from Samsung). Samsung products compatibility is overall better with non-Apple products and it works ok with Apple products too.

If you have to use Windows computers for work and use Microsoft Teams and all that, Samsung line works. If you want to connect with a Linux computer, Apple AirPods get terrible audio quality (and had same issue on Windows 11), but the Samsung Galaxy Buds (all of them) seem to work fine.

Re:How iTunes Is Changing on PC by jowea on Thursday February 08, 2024 @09:14PM (#39310630)
My experience is damaging cheap wired headphones way faster than with wireless. Although it certainly wasn't a 150$ wired or wireless headphone.