News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by edmundsauto on Saturday February 03, 2024 @11:50AM (#39242094)
Att made around a 12% profit margin, which seems reasonable if a bit high. Would you consider 12% == “printing money”? I usually think of 25+% margins like in big tech that way.

Not arguing just trying to understand how much money these companies are actually making.

Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by darkwizard42 on Saturday February 03, 2024 @11:52AM (#39242117)
12% in perpetuity with no stress the number will go down and lots of (imho insidious and customer unfriendly) ways for it to go up is in fact "printing money"

Being able to make money risk free without risk of competition always ends up being worse for the customer and bad for the overall economy (in terms of efficiency)

Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by simfree on Saturday February 03, 2024 @02:56PM (#39244136)
This is why AT&T keeps looking for the next big thing that will net them double digit margins in perpetuity with minimal effort.

They have bought and damaged the following assets in pursuit of this goal: DirecTV, HBO, CNN, Cartoon Network, Warner Bros and more.

AT&T has terribly mismanaged and damaged these assets, from destroying their carriage agreements with Dish and other cable companies for HBO, reducing their revenue by hundereds of millions a year, to, to more than halving the value if DirecTV by destroying its value proposition and failing to retain the customer base.

Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by PaulDavisThe1st on Saturday February 03, 2024 @12:52PM (#39242842)
Compared to what? Food retail is generally at 2% ...
Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by fsckboy on Saturday February 03, 2024 @04:38PM (#39244994)
food retail margins are 2% every time they turn over their inventory, which if they manage it properly can be much less than a month. so that 2% is annualized via a large multiplier

the margins for telecoms are considered on an annual basis.

Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by PaulDavisThe1st on Saturday February 03, 2024 @06:19PM (#39245787)
Sorry, I don't understand.

Are you saying that gross revenues for food retail are higher, and thus 2% of <a huge number> is bigger than 12% of <a smaller number> ?

Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by fsckboy on Saturday February 03, 2024 @09:41PM (#39247031)
if you buy broccoli and sell it a few days later at a 2% profit (net of costs), you just made 2%. if that took you a week, and you do it again the next week, and the week after that, you took your investment and grew it 52 weeks @ 2% a week, you'd be at 280% or more than 180% profit (1.02 ^ 52, presuming you also buy and sell 2% more of the broccoli itself every week. if you just buy the same amount of broccoli every week that's just 52 * .02 plus a little for interest, and you take the profits and pay off debts or take it as income, etc.)

if you lay fiber and connect it to the internet and hire cable guys to visit people's houses and customer service people to answer the phone, and your total revenue for a year minus your costs for a year comes out to a profit margin of 50%, you have 50% margins.

Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by jrflowers on Sunday February 04, 2024 @12:20AM (#39247819)
This math makes sense because grocery stores only buy broccoli once and then sell it over and over again for theoretically infinite profit. $1 spent on a broccoli over a year can be in the millions due to this phenomenon
Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by frumper on Saturday February 03, 2024 @10:03PM (#39247128)
If you buy broccoli for $1.00 and sell it in a week for $1.02 you’ve made 2%. If you buy another broccoli for $1.00 and sell it again for $1.02 then you’re still at a 2% profit for the year. You’ve spent $2 on inventory with revenue of $2.04, for a total profit margin of 2%. This is obviously simplified.
Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by fsckboy on Sunday February 04, 2024 @11:15AM (#39251463)
the piece of corporate finance you are missing is that the money you use to buy the broccoli is scarce, you have to "pay" for it. you can't leave it out of the calculation. You pay for it to who you borrowed it from, or to your shareholders, or the opportunity cost of taking it out of whatever use somebody else was paying you for.

that dollar you use to buy the broccoli, it's like a machine you use to knit sweaters. If you put that dollar to use for a year and sell one broccoli, you made 2%. If you put that same-single-dollar to use for a year and sell 52 broccolis, you made more.

what I originally said was that you can't just look at the margin on a sale, you need to look at inventory turn, how many times you collect the margin.

what makes the margin low is competition. a grocer is willing to accept a 2% margin on a sale because the cycle can be repeated many times in a year. In a sense, the interest rate (which is quoted at annual rates) on the borrowed dollar is fixed at that annual rate, but if you get to cycle through your operating capital quickly, you get to look at it as the amount of interest you need to pay each week.

Re:AT&T applies to end obligation to service landlines in Ca... by creer on Saturday February 03, 2024 @05:16PM (#39245323)
It's not a "big tech" product. It's an infrastructure product. A public utility. With (if they don't mess up) life-long subscription customers. With essentially zero risk (aside from infrastructure risk: earthquakes, upgrade cycles.)