News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by kccqzy on Thursday January 25, 2024 @08:15PM (#39137773)
That's a very U.S. centric perspective. It's somewhat less in the EU than in the U.S. to involve courts so readily.
Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by nozzlegear on Thursday January 25, 2024 @09:28PM (#39138267)
Apple is a very U.S. centric company so it makes sense they’re going to do things this way.
Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by jacquesm on Friday January 26, 2024 @12:48AM (#39139300)
It actually doesn't, they are operating in Europe so they have to do things that way.
Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by late2part on Friday January 26, 2024 @01:00AM (#39139362)
Then why aren't they?
Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by Maxion on Friday January 26, 2024 @03:48AM (#39140240)
They soon will
Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by OJFord on Thursday January 25, 2024 @09:35PM (#39138324)
It's a common law perspective really (writing from the UK) - laws are interpreted by judges and that forms a body of past cases which 'fill in the gaps' so to speak, and become the rule for the future. In contrast to civil law in much of Europe which attempts to codify everything, leaving nothing to interpretation. (I'm no expert - I don't know what happens when they come across a gap, the proceedings are suspended until legislators full it in I suppose?)

A US-centric perspective, stereotypically, would be like 'my Starbucks coffee is too cold, I am suing'. You can have common law without sue-happy individuals.

Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by anticensor on Friday January 26, 2024 @12:56AM (#39139337)
Or, sue-happy individuals without common law, such as in Latin America.
Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by ElFitz on Friday January 26, 2024 @01:14AM (#39139433)
> I'm no expert - I don't know what happens when they come across a gap, the proceedings are suspended until legislators full it in I suppose?

No, the judges rule with what they have, based on the case’s specifics and the "legislator’s intent" underpinning existing law.

Although it does not become law, their ruling can be used as precedent in later similar cases, until the legislator catches up.

Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by hnbad on Friday January 26, 2024 @06:28AM (#39141445)
The difference is that precedent can guide a judge's decision, it doesn't force it.

Likewise in civil law the judge isn't simply a referee, they're meant to actively investigate. While in common law lawyers get to do a big show by asking various questions, in civil law the questions are asked by the judge and the lawyers only exist to make an argument.

Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by mdekkers on Friday January 26, 2024 @01:23AM (#39139474)
> That's a very U.S. centric perspective. It's somewhat less common in the EU than in the U.S. to involve courts so readily.

For people, yes. For businesses, absolutely not.

Re:Apple announces changes to iOS, Safari, and the App Store... by rsynnott on Friday January 26, 2024 @08:02AM (#39142159)
Eh. I think "break the rules and see what happens" has been a _very_ common means of GDPR 'compliance' in Europe, in general. Worked, too, at least for a while; the first fines >100million only showed up in 2022 or so.