News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:IAC sold 17 apps to Bending Spoons. $100M deal, all 330 e... by andsoitis on Friday January 12, 2024 @10:38AM (#38969313)
> GP assumes the goal is to do just enough to keep the product alive.

They wrote "mature and don’t need a lot of work". Why would anyone put lots of people on a product that is mature and doesn't need a lot of work?

> This usually means a degraded customer experience.

Why? If the product is mature, works well, then surely you need fewer people to keep it in good shape and support customers?

Re:IAC sold 17 apps to Bending Spoons. $100M deal, all 330 e... by blamarvt on Friday January 12, 2024 @11:20AM (#38969930)
> Why would anyone put lots of people on a product that is mature and doesn't need a lot of work?

Nobody is suggesting anyone put 'lots of people' on a mature product. However, there are always things that need to be done.

Apps need to be updated for new devices, OS/library/security updates, and general bug reports to name a few. That's just on the app side, the same is true for any build pipelines/hosting infrastructure.

These apps don't run themselves regardless of how mature they are.

You're right in that fewer people are needed and I'm all for optimizing but what I feel like you're missing is that it's quite easy to over-optimize for cost at the expense of users.

Re:IAC sold 17 apps to Bending Spoons. $100M deal, all 330 e... by Keegs on Friday January 12, 2024 @11:14AM (#38969834)
Of course you can maintain mature products with a smaller workforce.

I’m pointing out that intent makes a difference. If Bending Spoons plans to put the apps on life support and squeeze out revenue - a fair assumption - then user experience will suffer.