Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by closeparen on Monday January 08, 2024 @05:39PM
(#38919346)
Tech is moving rapidly out of Silicon Valley... but strangely, straight to the developing world, skipping second-tier metros.
Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by sidlls on Monday January 08, 2024 @07:20PM
(#38920561)
Some tech is. Meanwhile large tech companies that are actually innovating (FAANG, near-FAANG, and FAANG-adjacent companies) are not. My comp has never been higher, and we're hiring. In the bay area.
Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by alasdair_ on Monday January 08, 2024 @10:32PM
(#38921955)
I’m honestly unable to name a single innovation from a FAANG that wasn’t just buying another company or cloning a competitor in the last five years.
What has Meta or Google or Microsoft actually innovated on recently?
Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by fragmede on Monday January 08, 2024 @11:49PM
(#38922451)
Self-driving cars, from the Google self-driving car project, which was later renamed Waymo, kinda seems like a big deal to me.
Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by hasty_pudding on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @01:27AM
(#38923067)
Will be interesting to see if they keep it going or shut it gown.
Google has a way of starting something and then shutting it down.
Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by bombcar on Monday January 08, 2024 @10:59PM
(#38922134)
The M1 is kinda innovative but Apple did “just buy companies”.
Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by charcircuit on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @12:58AM
(#38922902)
These companies are always innovating. Google doesn't just say "Our ad recommendation system is good enough, lets just go into maintenence mode for a year." No. They constantly are trying to improve their models, switch to a better architecture, and innovate to try and eke out a few more percentage points of conversions.
Re:IT employment grew by just 700 jobs in 2023
by hasty_pudding on Tuesday January 09, 2024 @01:25AM
(#38923056)
They havent innovated on anything of significance in decades. They just sit on their cash crops and buy up startups.
In the past decade (i.e., when the money was plentiful) when a startup is young, the TC of its engineers rarely makes or breaks the startup. Being able to get an MVP out and iterate quickly is more important, so it was a rational choice to stay in the Bay Area even if it means 30% inflated TC. And after that moving is expensive in both time and money and risky (e.g., a key engineer might not want to go).
And having a critical mass of tech companies helps attract talent: if a company goes under or has large layoffs it is perceived to be easier to find a new job in the center of the tech hub.
I think covid helped nudge along the process of moving tech development out of SV, but it is a slow process. My 2c.