News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by metadat on Monday January 01, 2024 @06:26PM (#38836282)
Do the "abusers" tend to be the actual owners though? If not, there's no actual IP to take away from them.

If not implemented carefully, this could incentivize shell games.

Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by ssl-3 on Monday January 01, 2024 @07:59PM (#38836895)
Does matter whether the abusers are the owners themselves or merely representative agents of that the owners have hired?

I don't think that it does.

Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by dns_snek on Monday January 01, 2024 @08:03PM (#38836918)
Per the definition, yes. A DMCA notice submitted by someone other than the copyright owner or someone acting on their behalf is invalid.
Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by bobthepanda on Monday January 01, 2024 @07:04PM (#38836510)
Also I could totally seeing this getting abused with competitors posting fake DMCA for one’s content to get their competition public domained.
Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by zmgsabst on Monday January 01, 2024 @09:09PM (#38837283)
That seems like you’d be committing perjury, which the victim could prove easily by showing there’s no authorization.
Re:All DMCA Notices Filed Against TorrentFreak in 2023 Were ... by zmgsabst on Monday January 01, 2024 @09:08PM (#38837278)
If you submit a DMCA notice without authorization, then it’s perjury.

If you submit one with authorization, then the authorizing party should put their IP as collateral.