Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by paxys on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @10:28AM
(#38696782)
Be discriminated against, fight five years in court and get a $90K payout. Where's the win exactly?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by kevin42 on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @10:31AM
(#38696819)
Hopefully it is a societal win, discouraging companies from age discrimination in the future. For us old guys, that feels like a win.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by onemoresoop on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @10:49AM
(#38697077)
Not sure what win this would be as companies will give zero feedback to avoid incriminating themselves, according to the article.
"The company’s recruiter also told him that Exact Sciences Corporation was “looking for someone more junior that can ... stay with the company for years to come,”
Sadly it doesn't look like age discrimination will stop, just the feedback will.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by paxys on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @11:10AM
(#38697366)
IMO a judgement like this doesn't discourage anything, just reinforces that fact that breaking the rules is advantageous and fines are a small cost of doing business.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @12:15PM
(#38698356)
Five years of litigation is no cake walk.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by TeckPerspecc on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @10:49AM
(#38697081)
All it will encourage is for companies to give zero feedback when they reject someone.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by sonicanatidae on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @11:09AM
(#38697350)
Not really. The problem with companies is when there is wrong-doing, it's just pittance fines and ultimately, those fines are paid with other people's money.
I wish it was more impactful.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by voxic11 on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @10:54AM
(#38697160)
He didn't have to fight five years in court. All he did was submit the complaint to the EEOC and they handled the investigation and lawsuit against the company.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by s1artibartfast on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @12:42PM
(#38698751)
go to a job interview, do something else for five years, get 90k. seems like a pretty good deal.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by JohnFen on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @11:44AM
(#38697895)
The win is in getting at least one of these bastards a penalty.
Re:Company refused to hire 49-year-old due to his age, feds ...
by halJordan on Tuesday December 19, 2023 @01:36PM
(#38699611)
I guess at this point its time for me to be age-discriminated bc im starting to say the same cliches as my father, I viscerally understand the phrase "ffs."
We all know the wheels of justice turn slowly. A wrong was righted and we're throwing it away because it wasn't speedy enough?
And there's even a second win, god forbid! The defendant had a fair day in court so we can have confidence the right thing happened! Dont be too quick to demand reprisals and call it justice.